scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Detection rate and predictive factors of sessile serrated polyps in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy)

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The low prevalence of SSPs and the lack of association with the FIT round argue against SSP as a suitable target for FIT-based organised programmes, and restricts the need for SSP-specific quality indicators in F IT-based programmes.
Abstract
Objectives To assess detection rate and predictive factors of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) in organised colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Design Data from a case series of colonoscopies of FIT-positive subjects were provided by 44 Italian CRC screening programmes. Data on screening history, endoscopic procedure and histology results, and additional information on the endoscopy centre and the endoscopists were collected, including the age-standardised and sex-standardised adenoma detection rate (ADR) of the individual endoscopists. The SSP detection rate (SSP-DR) was assessed for the study population. To identify SSP-predictive factors, multilevel analyses were performed according to patient/centre/endoscopist characteristics. Results We analysed 72 021 colonoscopies, of which 1295 presented with at least one SSP (SSP-DR 1.8%; 95% CI 1.7% to 1.9%). At the per-patient level, SSP-DR was associated with males (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.54) and caecal intubation (OR 3.75; 95% CI 2.22 to 6.34), but not with the FIT round. The presence of at least one advanced adenoma was more frequent among subjects with SSPs than those without (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.86 to 2.33). At the per-endoscopist level, SSP-DR was associated with ADR (third vs first ADR quartile: OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.35; fourth vs first quartile: OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.24 to 2.90). Conclusion The low prevalence of SSPs and the lack of association with the FIT round argue against SSP as a suitable target for FIT-based organised programmes. Strict association of SSP-DR with the key colonoscopy quality indicators, namely caecal intubation rate and high ADR further marginalises the need for SSP-specific quality indicators in FIT-based programmes.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study.

TL;DR: In this article , the authors investigated the incremental effect of the implementation of AI detection tools in screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and the cost-effectiveness of such tools.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006

TL;DR: The total number of new cases of cancer in Europe appears to have increased by 300,000 since 2004 and the ageing of the European population will cause these numbers to continue to increase even if age-specific rates remain constant.
Journal ArticleDOI

Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer

TL;DR: Colonoscopic screening can detect advanced colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic adults with or without distal neoplasia, and many of these neoplasm would not be detected with sigmoidoscopy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer

TL;DR: The adenoma detection rate is an independent predictor of the risk of interval colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy, and the rate of cecal intubation was not significantly associated with this risk.
Related Papers (5)