scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative:

TLDR
Endoscopy services across Europe are recommended to adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level.
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.

read more

Citations
More filters
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Revising consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno V Consensus Workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in Portal Hypertension

TL;DR: A Baveno V workshop was held on May 21–22, 2010, attended by many of the experts responsible for most of the major achievements of the last years in this field, and produced consensus statements on some important points, although some issues remained unsettled.
Journal ArticleDOI

Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.

TL;DR: Results add further support to previous studies for the clinical utility of the Los Angeles system for endoscopic grading of oesophagitis and to the risk for symptom relapse off therapy over six months.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer

TL;DR: The adenoma detection rate is an independent predictor of the risk of interval colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy, and the rate of cecal intubation was not significantly associated with this risk.
Related Papers (5)