Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative:
Michal F. Kaminski,Siwan Thomas-Gibson,Marek Bugajski,Michael Bretthauer,Colin J Rees,Evelien Dekker,Geir Hoff,Rodrigo Jover,Stepan Suchanek,Monika Ferlitsch,John Anderson,Thomas Roesch,Rolf Hultcranz,Istvan Racz,Ernst J. Kuipers,Kjetil Garborg,James E. East,Maciej Rupinski,Birgitte Seip,Cathy Bennett,Carlo Senore,Silvia Minozzi,Raf Bisschops,Dirk Domagk,Roland Valori,Cristiano Spada,Cesare Hassan,Mário Dinis-Ribeiro,Matthew D. Rutter +28 more
TLDR
Endoscopy services across Europe are recommended to adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level.Abstract:
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and United European Gastroenterology present a short list of key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. We recommend that endoscopy services across Europe adopt the following seven key performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy for measurement and evaluation in daily practice at a center and endoscopist level: 1 rate of adequate bowel preparation (minimum standard 90%); 2 cecal intubation rate (minimum standard 90%); 3 adenoma detection rate (minimum standard 25%); 4 appropriate polypectomy technique (minimum standard 80%); 5 complication rate (minimum standard not set); 6 patient experience (minimum standard not set); 7 appropriate post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations (minimum standard not set). Other identified performance measures have been listed as less relevant based on an assessment of their importance, scientific acceptability, feasibility, usability, and comparison to competing measures.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.
Cesare Hassan,James E. East,Franco Radaelli,Cristiano Spada,Robert Benamouzig,Raf Bisschops,Michael Bretthauer,Evelien Dekker,Mário Dinis-Ribeiro,Monika Ferlitsch,Lorenzo Fuccio,Halim Awadie,Ian M. Gralnek,Rodrigo Jover,Michal F. Kaminski,Maria Pellise,Konstantinos Triantafyllou,Giuseppe Vanella,Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan,Leonardo Frazzoni,Jeanin E. van Hooft,Jean-Marc Dumonceau +21 more
TL;DR: ESGE recommends the use of high volume or low volume PEG-based regimens as well as that of non-PEG- based agents that have been clinically validated for routine bowel preparation as an acceptable alternative to split dosing.
Journal ArticleDOI
Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG)
Kevin J. Monahan,Nicola Bradshaw,Sunil Dolwani,Bianca DeSouza,Malcolm G. Dunlop,James E. East,Mohammad Ilyas,Asha Kaur,Fiona Lalloo,Andrew Latchford,Matthew D. Rutter,Ian Tomlinson,Huw Thomas,James Hill +13 more
TL;DR: This guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC.
Journal ArticleDOI
Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020
Cesare Hassan,Giulio Antonelli,Jean-Marc Dumonceau,Jaroslaw Regula,Michael Bretthauer,Stanislas Chaussade,Evelien Dekker,Monika Ferlitsch,Antonio Z. Gimeno-García,Rodrigo Jover,Mette Kalager,Maria Pellise,Christian Pox,Luigi Ricciardiello,Matthew D. Rutter,Lise Mørkved Helsingen,Arne Bleijenberg,Carlo Senore,Jeanin E. van Hooft,Mário Dinis-Ribeiro,Enrique Quintero +20 more
TL;DR: The following recommendations for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance apply to all patients who had one or more polyps that were completely removed during a high quality baseline colonoscopy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ecco-esgar guideline for diagnostic assessment in ibd part 2: Ibd scores and general principles and technical aspects
Andreas Sturm,Christian Maaser,Emma Calabrese,Vito Annese,Gionata Fiorino,Torsten Kucharzik,Stephan R. Vavricka,Bram Verstockt,Patrick F. van Rheenen,Damian Tolan,Stuart A. Taylor,Jordi Rimola,Florian Rieder,Jimmy K. Limdi,Andrea Laghi,Eduards Krustins,Paulo Gustavo Kotze,Uri Kopylov,Konstantinos Katsanos,Steve Halligan,Hannah Gordon,Yago González Lama,Pierre Ellul,Rami Eliakim,Fabiana Castiglione,Johan Burisch,Paula Borralho Nunes,Dominik Bettenworth,Daniel C. Baumgart,Jaap Stoker +29 more
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon H. Guyatt,Andrew D Oxman,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Regina Kunz,Yngve Falck-Ytter,Pablo Alonso-Coello,Holger J. Schünemann +6 more
TL;DR: The advantages of the GRADE system are explored, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide and which is often praised for its high level of consistency.
Journal ArticleDOI
Revising consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno V Consensus Workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in Portal Hypertension
TL;DR: A Baveno V workshop was held on May 21–22, 2010, attended by many of the experts responsible for most of the major achievements of the last years in this field, and produced consensus statements on some important points, although some issues remained unsettled.
Journal ArticleDOI
Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification.
L. R. Lundell,J. R. Bennett,André L. Blum,David Armstrong,J. P. Galmiche,F. Johnson,Michio Hongo,Joel E. Richter,Stuart J. Spechler,G. N J Tytgat,L. Wallin +10 more
TL;DR: Results add further support to previous studies for the clinical utility of the Los Angeles system for endoscopic grading of oesophagitis and to the risk for symptom relapse off therapy over six months.
Journal ArticleDOI
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
Michal F. Kaminski,Jaroslaw Regula,Ewa Kraszewska,Marcin Polkowski,Urszula Wojciechowska,Joanna Didkowska,Maria Zwierko,Maciej Rupinski,M. Nowacki,Eugeniusz Butruk +9 more
TL;DR: The adenoma detection rate is an independent predictor of the risk of interval colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy, and the rate of cecal intubation was not significantly associated with this risk.
Journal ArticleDOI
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
Douglas A. Corley,Christopher D. Jensen,Amy R. Marks,Wei K. Zhao,Jeffrey Lee,Chyke A. Doubeni,Ann G. Zauber,Jolanda de Boer,Bruce Fireman,Joanne E. Schottinger,Virginia P. Quinn,Nirupa R. Ghai,Theodore R. Levin,Charles P. Quesenberry +13 more
TL;DR: The adenoma detection rate was inversely associated with the risks of interval colorectal cancer, advanced-stage interval cancer, and fatal interval cancer.