scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North

TLDR
In this paper, the authors apply bibliometric and econometric analysis to study how citation impact varies across countries and find that specialization in particular scientific fields seems significantly more important in the Global South than in the global North.
About
This article is published in Research Policy.The article was published on 2017-02-01 and is currently open access. It has received 77 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Citation impact & Bibliometrics.

read more

Citations
More filters

Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities

TL;DR: Citation indexing its theory and application in science technology and humanities and instead of enjoying a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some infectious virus inside their computer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications.

TL;DR: The order of signatures and the address for correspondence in scientific publications are bibliographic characteristics that facilitate a precise, in-depth analysis of cooperative practices and their associations with concepts like dominance or leadership.
Journal ArticleDOI

Academia's responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19

TL;DR: In this article , a holistic view of research that investigated online learning in higher education around the globe during COVID-19 utilizing a bibliometric analysis was provided. But, the authors focused on the use of various technologies and strategies, redesigned curriculum, student perceptions and psychological impacts of the pandemic-imposed online learning.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mapping online hate: A scientometric analysis on research trends and hotspots in research on online hate

TL;DR: This research investigates the growing body of online hate research (OHR) by mapping general research indices, prevalent themes of research, research hotspots, and influential stakeholders such as organizations and contributing regions by identifying four main clusters of OHR.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sharing economy in hospitality and tourism: a review and the future pathways

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic review of the academic literature on the sharing economy (SE) phenomenon within hospitality and tourism and identify knowledge gaps that may present opportunistic opportunities is presented.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the ability of a firm to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it to commercial ends is critical to its innovative capabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.

TL;DR: The psychosocial conditions and mechanisms underlying the Matthew effect are examined and a correlation between the redundancy function of multiple discoveries and the focalizing function of eminent men of science is found—a function which is reinforced by the great value these men place upon finding basic problems and by their self-assurance.
Book

Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts

TL;DR: The authors presents laboratory science in a deliberately skeptical way: as an anthropological approach to the culture of the scientist, drawing on recent work in literary criticism, the authors study how the social world of the laboratory produces papers and other "texts,"' and how the scientific vision of reality becomes that set of statements considered, for the time being, too expensive to change.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Determinants of citation impact: a comparative analysis of the global south versus the global north" ?

In this article, the authors apply bibliometric and econometric analysis to identify which countries are producing research with relatively higher scientific influence, and to understand what factors lead to higher citation impact. The authors propose possible explanations for the patterns found and derive some policy implications. 

The authors found that previous citation impact, level of international collaboration and publication output in a specific scientific field are important determinants of citation impact among all nations. 

The research fields retained are as follows: Agricultural Sciences, Biology & Biochemistry Chemistry, Clinical Medicine, Computer Science, Economics & Business, Engineering, Environment/Ecology, Geosciences, Immunology, Materials Science, Mathematics, Microbiology, Molecular Biology & Genetics, Multidisciplinary, Neuroscience & Behaviour, Pharmacology & Toxicology, Physics, Plant & Animal Science, Psychiatry & Psychology, Social Sciences (general) and Space Science. 

Accessing external complementary knowledge and skills through networking, namely with scientists working in more developed environments, seems to be extremely significant for performing research with high impact. 

Because status influences perceptions of quality, those with high reputation can increase their odds of keeping being cited, thus reinforcing further their status. 

for high-income countries, both higher levels of GDPpc and small country size, which is again highly correlated with international collaboration intensity, seem to be critical factors. 

According to the social constructivist perspective, citations perpetuate and shape existing patterns of institutional stratification and are little more than appeals to existing authority on the part of authors who wish to buttress their arguments. 

Overcoming such path-dependencies implies persistence, continuous investment and far-reaching institutional change, as those successful cases have confirmed. 

Radosevic & Yoruk (2014) have defined absorptive capacity in the context of scientific research as “the ability to recognize the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and apply it in another context”. 

In the Global South, an Anglophone colonial history and concomitant opportunities for partnerships with English speaking countries, for example by housing international research institutes, may have a significant effect on their citation impact. 

There are several ways which research carried out within national borders can help to provide both effective and focused responses to domestic problems, namely by being an enabler for providing up-to-date and qualified training for the new generations of university graduates, helping to attract qualified people to the country, and improving the quality of local advice to government and industry (Goldemberg, 1998). 

the bibliometric assessment of research performance is based on a central assumption: scientists who have to communicate something important do publish their findings in international peer-reviewed journals.