scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Developing, implementing and disseminating a core outcome set for neonatal medicine

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A core outcome set for neonatal medicine is developed to ensure outcomes of importance to key stakeholders, including former patients and parents, are recorded and reported in a standard fashion in future research.
Abstract
Background In high resource settings, 1 in 10 newborn babies require admission to a neonatal unit. Research evaluating neonatal care involves recording and reporting many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation limits the usefulness of research as studies cannot be compared or combined. To address these limitations, we aim to develop, disseminate and implement a core outcome set for neonatal medicine. Methods A steering group that includes parents and former patients, healthcare professionals and researchers has been formed to guide the development of the core outcome set. We will review neonatal trials systematically to identify previously reported outcomes. Additionally, we will specifically identify outcomes of importance to parents, former patients and healthcare professionals through a systematic review of qualitative studies. Outcomes identified will be entered into an international, multi-perspective eDelphi survey. All key stakeholders will be invited to participate. The Delphi method will encourage individual and group stakeholder consensus to identify a core outcome set. The core outcome set will be mapped to existing, routinely recorded data where these exist. Discussion Use of a core set will ensure outcomes of importance to key stakeholders, including former patients and parents, are recorded and reported in a standard fashion in future research. Embedding the core outcome set within future clinical studies will extend the usefulness of research to inform practice, enhance patient care and ultimately improve outcomes. Using routinely recorded electronic data will facilitate implementation with minimal addition burden. Trial registration number Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database: 842 (www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/842).

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Contemporary Outcomes for Infants with Necrotizing Enterocolitis-A Systematic Review.

TL;DR: A systematic review of recent large cohort studies reporting outcomes of infants who developed NEC to develop an accurate understanding of outcomes for necrotizing enterocolitis to inform parental counseling, clinical care, and research agendas and justify ongoing research efforts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of family-centred care interventions on preterm infants and parents in neonatal intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

TL;DR: FCC interventions can improve weight gain and readmission in preterm infants as well as parent satisfaction, knowledge, and skills, and possibly long-term anxiety, depression, and stress.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: An international consensus development study

TL;DR: A minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, has been developed for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating potential treatments for infertility, which consists of viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound, pregnancy loss, live birth; gestational age at delivery; birthweight; neonatal mortality; and major congenital anomaly.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary?

TL;DR: An instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research is described and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality is described.
Book

A technique for the measurement of attitudes

Rensis Likert
TL;DR: The instrument to be described here is not, however, indirect in the usual sense of the word; it does not seek responses to items apparently unrelated to the attitudes investigated, and seeks to measure prejudice in a manner less direct than is true of the usual prejudice scale.
Reference EntryDOI

“Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A”

TL;DR: The instrument to be described here is not, however, indirect in the usual sense of the word; it does not seek responses to items apparently unrelated to the attitudes investigated, and seeks to measure prejudice in a manner less direct than is true of the usual prejudice scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts

TL;DR: The DELPHI method was devised in order to obtain the most reliable opinion consensus of a group of experts by subjecting them to a series of questionnaires in depth interspersed with controlled opinion feedback as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus

TL;DR: The Delphi technique is well suited as a method for consensus-building by using a series of questionnaires delivered using multiple iterations to collect data from a panel of selected subjects.
Related Papers (5)