Journal ArticleDOI
Editorial: Journal article reporting standards.
TLDR
This issue of American Psychologist features a pair of important articles related to newly updated standards for reporting research in psychology in scientific journals, covering both quantitative and qualitative research.Abstract:
In this editorial, the author notes that this issue of American Psychologist features a pair of important articles related to newly updated standards for reporting research in psychology in scientific journals, covering both quantitative (Appelbaum et al., 2018) and qualitative (Levitt et al., 2018) research. The increasing breadth and complexity of research, and the importance of communicating it effectively, requires user-friendly resources that can be applied widely to scientific studies. These two articles are intended to serve that purpose, and to encourage thoroughness and accuracy in research reporting, for psychologists and other scientists in broader academic communities. The articles, known as the Journal Article Reporting Standards (JARS) reports, are based on the work of a task force appointed by the American Psychological Association (APA) Publications and Communications Board in 2015. (PsycINFO Database Recordread more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Ambulatory assessment in psychopathology research: A review of recommended reporting guidelines and current practices.
TL;DR: The reported practices of published studies using AA in major psychopathology journals over the last 7 years are reviewed and recommendations for reporting the features of future AA studies in psychopathology are made.
Journal ArticleDOI
Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review
TL;DR: It is argued that the field of psychology and research synthesis in general should require review authors to report these elements in a transparent and reproducible manner.
Journal ArticleDOI
Uniting and dividing influences of religion in marriage among highly religious couples.
Journal ArticleDOI
An invitation to analytic abduction
Michael Halpin,Norann Richard +1 more
TL;DR: Analytical abduction as mentioned in this paper combines the strengths of both inductive and deductive inquiry by reasoning from concrete data, but using this data to extend, refine, or refute existing theories or propositions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Implications of the Open Science Era for Educational Psychology Research Syntheses.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that "extensive debate of potentially common, yet questionable research practices that lead to biased findings within social and health sciences has emerged over the last decade".
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.
Heidi M. Levitt,Michael Bamberg,John W. Creswell,David M. Frost,Ruthellen Josselson,Carola Suárez-Orozco +5 more
TL;DR: This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) andAPA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA style.
Journal ArticleDOI
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.
TL;DR: Modifications to reporting standards for scientific publication were accepted by the Publications and Communications Board of APA and supersede the standards included in the 6th edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology: Why Do We Need Them? What Might They Be?
TL;DR: The resulting recommendations contain standards for all journal articles, and more specific standards for reports of studies with experimental manipulations or evaluations of interventions using research designs involving random or nonrandom assignment.