scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Effect of influent nutrient ratios and hydraulic retention time (HRT) on simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in a two-sludge sequencing batch reactor process

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A real-time control strategy for A(2)N-SBR can be undertaken based on some characteristic points of pH, redox potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles in order to obtain the optimum hydraulic retention time (HRT) and improve the operating reliability.
About
This article is published in Bioresource Technology.The article was published on 2009-07-01 and is currently open access. It has received 144 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Phosphorus metabolism & Hydraulic retention time.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Characteristics of water quality of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: implications for resources utilization and management

TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper performed comprehensive analyses based on statistical data collected from 3340 Chinese municipal wastewater treatment plants to understand the effects of influent and effluent wastewater quality on the treatment performance, environmental concerns and resources utilization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Treating low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) wastewater in simultaneous nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorous removal (SNDPR) systems by strengthening anaerobic intracellular carbon storage

TL;DR: A novel simultaneous nitrification denitrification and phosphorous removal-sequencing batch reactor (SNDPR-SBR) enriched with PAOs (phosphorus accumulating organisms), DPAOs (denitrifying PAOs), and GAOs (glycogen accumulating organisms) was developed to achieve the simultaneous nutrient and carbon removal treating domestic wastewater with low carbon/nitrogen ratio.
Journal ArticleDOI

Technologies for biological removal and recovery of nitrogen from wastewater.

TL;DR: An overview of various technologies of biological nitrogen removal including nitrification, denitrification, anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox), as well as bioelectrochemical systems and microalgal growth for nitrogen recovery are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bioaugmentation treatment of municipal wastewater with heterotrophic-aerobic nitrogen removal bacteria in a pilot-scale SBR.

TL;DR: The proposed emerging technology was shown to be an alternative technology to establish new wastewater treatment systems and upgrade or retrofit conventional systems from secondary-level to tertiary-level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enhanced nutrient removal in a modified step feed process treating municipal wastewater with different inflow distribution ratios and nutrient ratios.

TL;DR: The proposed system was demonstrated to be an attractive enhanced biological nutrient removal process for wastewater treatment plants due to relatively high nutrient removal, robust sludge settleability and energy savings.
References
More filters
Book

Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater

TL;DR: The most widely read reference in the water industry, Water Industry Reference as discussed by the authors, is a comprehensive reference tool for water analysis methods that covers all aspects of USEPA-approved water analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process

TL;DR: In this paper, a review of the microbiological and biochemical aspects of the enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR) process is presented, including microorganisms responsible for EBPR, isolation of polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs), microbial diversity of the EBPR sludge, biochemical metabolisms of PAOs, energy budget in PAOs metabolism, denitrification by PAO, glycogen accumulating non-poly-P organisms (GAOs), etc.
Journal ArticleDOI

The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems.

TL;DR: The history of EBPR, the currently available biochemical models, the structure of the microbial communities found in EBPR systems, possible identities of the bacteria responsible, and the evidence why these systems might operate suboptimally are looked at.
Journal ArticleDOI

Phosphorus and nitrogen removal with minimal COD requirement by integration of denitrifying dephosphatation and nitrification in a two-sludge system

TL;DR: In this article, an anaerobic-anoxic (A2) sequencing batch reactor (SBR) coupled with a nitrification SBR was evaluated. And the technical feasibility for simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in the proposed two-sludge system was evaluated, and it was concluded that the separation of the nitrification step leads to an optimal process design for the application of denitrifying dephosphatation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biological phosphorus removal from wastewater by anaerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactor

TL;DR: In this paper, an anaerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactor (SBR) was used in order to investigate the possibility of phosphorus removal utilizing nitrate as an electron acceptor, instead of oxygen in biological phosphorus removal processes.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q1. What are the contributions in "Effect of influent nutrient ratios and hydraulic retention time (hrt) on simultaneous phosphorus and nitrogen removal in two-sludge sequencing batch reactor" ?

In this paper, a laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic/nitrification sequencing batch reactor ( A2N-SBR ) fed with domestic wastewater was operated to examine the effect of varying ratios of influent COD/P, cOD/TN and TN/P on the nutrient removal. 

By addition of carbon source in anaerobic phase, more readily biodegradable compounds are available to PAO/DNPAO for synthesis internal PHB; thereby the N and P removal efficiencies can be promoted simultaneously. 

At the beginning of anoxic phase, phosphorus concentration was normally 42 mg/L on average, and then decreased to 20.8 mg/L at the end of anoxic phase as a result of the denitrifying phosphorus uptake. 

The phosphorus concentrations of influent and effluent in Run 3 both declined to 6.9 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively, with the increased phosphorus removal efficiency of 97%. 

The biofilm N-SBR performed well throughout the experimental period with NH3-N ions almost completely converting to NO3- or NO2-. 

This finding revealed that the post-aeration phase was indispensable to A2N-SBR process for polishing the effluent, as the post aerobic phosphorus uptake accounted for approximately 45% of the phosphorus removal when electron acceptors as NO3--N were not available. 

the tests of HRT effect indicated that the duration for the anaerobic and anoxic reactions significantly affected the final nitrogen and phosphorus removals especially for the P removal that is prone to occur “second phosphorus” release in the absence of electron donors (e.g. COD) and acceptors (e.g. O2 or NOx-N),thereby lowering the final phosphorus removal efficiency. 

In A2-SBR, an immediate and sharp increase in pH ranging from 7.06 to a peak of 7.21 (shown with point A in Fig. 2) was observed at the initial 15 min of anaerobic phase which was attributable to the VFAs uptake by DNPAO/PAO. 

In general, high COD/P favors the improvement of phosphorus removal (Fig. 4); however, in the A2N-SBR process that based on the denitrifying phosphorus removal, the final P-uptake capacity also greatly depends on the amount of electron acceptors (NOx-N), i.e. the influent N/P ratios. 

As the mean influent NH4+-N concentration during the spring semester was found to be approximately 25 mg/L lower than that of the autumn semester, a spike of nitrate (KNO3) of 10mg/L NO3--N was added to the initial anoxic phase to ensure there was no limitation of electron acceptors for a complete phosphorus uptake. 

As a result, the electron donors (COD) available to DNPAO are reduced, finally leading to the deterioration of phosphorus removal capacity. 

The average concentrations of COD, Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), total nitrogen (TN), NH4+-N and phosphorus in the influent wastewater over the experimental period were 237±58 mg/L, 145±98 mg/L, 37±21 mg/L, 35±20 mg/L and 12±5 mg/L, respectively. 

it is worthy noting that on day 241 the end of the P-uptake was not pointed out by DO or pH variations (Figs. 1 and 2), probably due to the fact that the 2h post-aeration reaction was not sufficient for complete phosphorus uptake. 

Table 3 Performance of A2N-SBR process for removal of COD, NH4+-N, TN and P (aaverage data are in parenthesis)For the phosphorus removal, as the influent phosphorus concentration was adjusted in a broad range to gain the different COD/P, this subsequently caused a significant fluctuation of phosphorus removal efficiency even though the average phosphorus removal efficiency had reached 89% (Table 3).