Electron, photon, and ion beams from the relativistic interaction of Petawatt laser pulses with solid targets
read more
Citations
Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser–solid interactions
Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction
Review of laser-driven ion sources and their applications.
Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase
Laser acceleration of quasi-monoenergetic MeV ion beams
References
The stopping and range of ions in solids
Relativistic magnetic self-channeling of light in near-critical plasma: Three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulation.
Experimental Measurements of Hot Electrons Generated by Ultraintense ( > 10 19 W / cm 2 ) Laser-Plasma Interactions on Solid-Density Targets
Collisionless plasma expansion into a vacuum
The Integrated TIGER Series (ITS) of Coupled Electron/Photon Monte Carlo Transport Codes
Related Papers (5)
Intense High-Energy Proton Beams from Petawatt-Laser Irradiation of Solids
Fast ignition by intense laser-accelerated proton beams.
Frequently Asked Questions (10)
Q2. Where did the instrument record the energy spectrum of the protons?
For targets irradiated at 45o incidence the instrument recorded the energy spectrum on the axis of the proton beam while for targets at normal incidence it recorded the spectrum 45o off axis .
Q3. What is the effect of the ponderomotive potential scaling?
The electron energies are consistent with the ponderomotive potential scaling if relativistic self-focussing increases the nominal intensity by a factor of 2 or more.
Q4. What was the maximum penetration of the beam?
The maximum penetration of the beam showed that there were proton energies >40MeV, and the attenuation with thickness indicated a slope temperature of ~6 MeV.
Q5. What is the effect of the interaction of the focused main pulse with the pre-formed plasma and?
The interaction of the focused main pulse with the pre-formed plasma and the underlying solid generates an intense hot electron source with an energy spectrum related to the laser intensity as described above.
Q6. How many protons were in the beam?
The absolute number of activated nuclei showed that there was a total of 3x10 13 protons (or 30J of energy ) which was 7% of the laser energy incident on the target.
Q7. How can one use the known cross-sections as a function of energy to fit ?
Therefore by comparing the average activation of the gold behind the nickel disc to the activation of the nickel and assuming a simple two parameter spectral form for the bremsstrahlung, say an overall constant and an exponential “temperature” I0 exp −h / T( ) , one can use the known cross-sections as a function of energy to fit a spectrum to the data.
Q8. What does the data and the simulations suggest?
Both the data and the simulations suggest that under their conditions the deflection is a limited instability with random behavior.
Q9. What is the ion front where the sheath separates?
The steep ion front where the sheath separates is a familiar dynamical attractor as the acceleration proceeds, cf. Denavit11 and references therein.
Q10. What was the yield of the neutrons in the beam?
This yield was attributed to several neutron producing channels of proton interaction with Be nuclei and was an order of magnitude greater than the neutron yield without Be present.