scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the purpose of engineering education is to train engineers who can design, and that design thinking is difficult to learn and difficult to teach, and the most popular pedagogical model for teaching design is Project-Based Learning (PBL).
Abstract
This paper is based on the premises that the purpose of engineering education is to graduate engineers who can design, and that design thinking is complex. The paper begins by briefly reviewing the history and role of design in the engineering curriculum. Several dimensions of design thinking are then detailed, explaining why design is hard to learn and harder still to teach, and outlining the research available on how well design thinking skills are learned. The currently most-favored pedagogical model for teaching design, project-based learning (PBL), is explored next, along with available assessment data on its success. Two contexts for PBL are emphasized: first-year cornerstone courses and globally dispersed PBL courses. Finally, the paper lists some of the open research questions that must be answered to identify the best pedagogical practices of improving design learning, after which it closes by making recommendations for research aimed at enhancing design learning.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on classroom-based pedagogies of engagement, particularly cooperative and problem-based learning, and present a brief history, theoretical roots, research support, summary of practices, and suggestions for redesigning engineering classes and programs to include more student engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures

TL;DR: In this article, the authors take a critical look at the design thinking discourse, one that has different meanings depending on its context, and find five different discourses of "designerly thinking" or ways to describe what designers do in practice, that have distinctly different epistemological roots.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore how engineering education can support acquisition of a wide range of knowledge and skills associated with comprehending and using STEM knowledge to accomplish real world problem solving through design, troubleshooting, and analysis activities.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize and synthesize the research on design thinking to better understand its characteristics and processes, as well as the differences between novice and expert design thinkers, and apply the findings from the literature regarding the application of design thinking in our educational system.

Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in

TL;DR: The National Research Council's Discipline-Based Education Research (DBER) report (National Research Council, 2012) captures the state-of-theart advances in our understanding of engineering and science student learning and highlights commonalities with other science-based education research programs.
References
More filters
Book

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

TL;DR: The authors described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available.
Book

How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.

TL;DR: New developments in the science of learning as mentioned in this paper overview mind and brain how experts differ from novices how children learn learning and transfer the learning environment curriculum, instruction and commnity effective teaching.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

TL;DR: The search for scientific bases for confronting problems of social policy is bound to fail, becuase of the nature of these problems as discussed by the authors, whereas science has developed to deal with tame problems.