Evolving Problems to Learn About Particle Swarm Optimizers and Other Search Algorithms

TLDR: In this article, the authors use evolutionary computation to automatically find problems which demonstrate the strength and weaknesses of modern search heuristics, such as particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and covariance matrix adaptation-evolution strategy (CMA-ES).

Abstract: We use evolutionary computation (EC) to automatically find problems which demonstrate the strength and weaknesses of modern search heuristics. In particular, we analyze particle swarm optimization (PSO), differential evolution (DE), and covariance matrix adaptation-evolution strategy (CMA-ES). Each evolutionary algorithm is contrasted with the others and with a robust nonstochastic gradient follower (i.e., a hill climber) based on Newton-Raphson. The evolved benchmark problems yield insights into the operation of PSOs, illustrate benefits and drawbacks of different population sizes, velocity limits, and constriction (friction) coefficients. The fitness landscapes made by genetic programming reveal new swarm phenomena, such as deception, thereby explaining how they work and allowing us to devise better extended particle swarm systems. The method could be applied to any type of optimizer.