Fluorescence-Activated Droplet Sorting of Polyethylene terephthalate Degrading Enzymes
read more
References
MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
A Bacterium That Degrades and Assimilates Poly(ethylene Terephthalate)
Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity
An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles
Related Papers (3)
Frequently Asked Questions (18)
Q2. What are the future works in "Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting of polyethylene terephthalate-degrading enzymes" ?
Nano/micro-scale polymer particles coupled with fluorogenic enzymatic activity sensors are preferred to mimic the crystalline structures of plastic polymers in future work.
Q3. Why did the authors develop and optimize the pipeline?
Because environmental microbes require longer incubation, the authors developed and optimized the pipeline to include long-term pre-incubation following microfluidic picoinjection of the fluorescence substrate FDBz.
Q4. What was used for loading and infusing solutions into the devices?
Gastight glass syringes (Agilent, Reno, NV) were used for loading and infusing solutions into the devices by Syringe Pumps (Pump 11 PicoPlus, Harvard Apparatus, USA).
Q5. What is the purpose of this study?
The authors envision that the FADS pipeline developed in this study can be widely applied to the discovery of PET-degrading microorganisms and enzymes.
Q6. What are the criteria for a rapid, sensitive, and specific fluorogenic assay?
To develop a rapid, sensitive, and specific fluorogenic assay for droplet-based singlecell sorting of PETases, the following criteria have to be met: (a) structural similarity between the fluorogenic probe and PET polymer structure; (b) good sensitivity and specificity for fluorescence discrimination of PETases from other enzymes; and (c) low level of self-hydrolysis, leakage and cross-talk of the fluorogenic probe and its hydrolyzed products between droplets.
Q7. What is the characterization of the putative PETases?
The authors then carried out degradation assays using p-NPB, FDBz, and PET films as the substrates to evaluate the degrading activity of S9_948 and PHB.
Q8. How long does it take to find new biodegrading enzymes?
The screening of novel degrading microbes and enzymes remains a slow and complex process due to the inefficiency of current sorting techniques5, 13-14.
Q9. How long does it take to degrade plastic?
Traditional measurements for plastic biodegradation include plastic weight loss, changes in the mechanical properties or the chemical structure, and carbon dioxide emission, butthese can take up to several months.
Q10. What is the peptide at the N-terminus of PHB?
PHB has a putative 28-residue signal peptide at their N-termini suggesting that it is secretory proteins like LC-Est1 (AIT56387.1, 25-residue signal peptide).
Q11. How was the degradation of PETases evaluated?
The PET degradation performances of positive isolates were evaluated by fermentation with PET fibers and observation of surface erosion of PET films.
Q12. What is the significance of the results?
Their results prove that the FADS method could be applied to and effectively speed up the screening of environmental microbes present in various environments.
Q13. What is the sequence of the putative PETases?
Two putative PETases were selected following sequence interpretation of whole-genome sequences of Un-5 and Un-C2-8 and database searching: S9_948 belonging to the carboxylesterase family found in the genomes of both strains and PHB belonging to the dienelactone hydrolase family in the genome of Un-5.
Q14. What are the possible enzymes involved in the biodegradation of PET?
In addition, the biodegradation of PET by Un-5 and Un-C2-8 might involves multiple enzymes and steps and S9_948 and PHB are potentially participating enzymes.
Q15. What is the kinetics of the fluorescence intensities of positive and negative droplets?
The histogram showed that fluorescence intensities of positive droplets were in the range of 2.0×106 to 8.5×106, and the fluorescence intensities of negative droplets were in a much lower range of 1.0×104 to 5.0×104 (Fig. S4).
Q16. How was the degradation of PET film evaluated?
The degradation of PET film by the crude S9_948 or PHB was evaluated by incubating PET film with the enzyme for seven days at 37°C, and evaluated by morphological characterization as described above.
Q17. What is the way to evaluate PETases?
It is still difficult to efficiently evaluate the activity of PETases due to the lack of rapid, specific, sensitive, and quantitative detecting and sorting methods.
Q18. What is the sequence of the catalytic serine residue in PHB?
For S9_948, as expected for an α/β-hydrolase, its sequence contains a conserved Gly-X-Ser-X-Gly motif (GQSAG), which includes the catalytic serine residue (Fig. S9).