Graphite Oxide-TiO2 Nanocomposite Type Photocatalyst for Methanol Photocatalytic Reforming Reaction
read more
Citations
Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from biomass conversion
Photocatalytic Reforming for Hydrogen Evolution: A Review
The role of terminal groups in dendrimer systems for the treatment of organic contaminants in aqueous environments
Investigation of Ti-Mo mixed oxide-carbon composite supported Pt electrocatalysts: Effect of the type of carbonaceous materials
Preparation and Characterization of Nanocrystalline TiO2 on Microsericite for High-Efficiency Photo-Energy Conversion of Methanol to Hydrogen
References
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces - Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Improved Synthesis of Graphene Oxide
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What are the advantages of the co-catalysts?
The advantages of the co-catalysts are attributed to the suppressed charge recombination; promoted charge separation and transport driven by junctions/interfaces [19–21].
Q3. What is the promising approach for transforming solar energy into chemical energy for storage and transport?
Photocatalytic hydrogen production is a promising approach for transforming solar energy into chemical energy for storage and transport.
Q4. What is the key factor for the beneficial co-catalytic effect of the GO?
Model experiments with specially pre-treated photocatalysts suggested that in situ development of a strong chemical coupling between the reduced graphene oxide sheets and TiO2 may be the key factor for the beneficial co-catalytic effect of the GO.
Q5. What is the method for reducing graphene oxide?
In addition, the UV-assisted photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide for preparation of R-GO/TiO2 composites is a well-known method [66], during which TiO2 and GO is irradiated in a slurry in a reductive medium i.e. ethanol.
Q6. What is the criterion for the GO/TiO2 composites?
According to photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, no reduction of the TiO2 particles is evident after the photocatalytic reaction, thus the significant blackening of the recovered composite type samples indicates that structural changes of the GO/ TiO2 composites occurred during the reaction and these changes must be related to the GO part.
Q7. What is the important contribution of graphitic carbon to the methanol?
In the spectra of the hydrothermally treated catalysts both in the fresh and the recovered state the dominant contribution arises from graphitic carbon; its binding energy around 284.0 eV suggests the pronounced coupling of the carbon skeleton to TiO2 during the treatment.
Q8. How many eV were recorded in the energy analyzer?
Spectra were recorded in the Constant Analyzer Energy mode of the energy analyzer with 30 eV pass energy resulting in a spectral resolution of around 1 eV.
Q9. What is the effect of the presence of alcohol on the structure of the electric double layer?
The presence of the alcohol changes both the dielectric and solvation properties of the medium and causes a significant effect on the structure of the electric double layer developed at the surface of charged colloidal particles.
Q10. What is the reason why the GO is an important material?
the GO may become an important material which could make the photocatalyst cheaper; that’s why understanding its behavior in composites is essential.
Q11. What is the main contribution to the spectra of the fresh samples?
This analysis suggests that the main contribution to the spectra of the fresh samples in both the 2 and 10 wt% cases comes from a double-peaked feature with maxima at 284.3 and 286.3 eV, which corresponds to the C–C and C–O peaks from the spectrum of GO.
Q12. What was the effect of the functional groups in the organic substances?
The factor of photocatalytic activity enhancement was strongly affected by the various functional groups appearing in the organic substances.
Q13. How was the effect of possible electric charging compensated?
Effects of possible electric charging were compensated by adjusting the binding energy of the Ti 2p3/2 peak to 458.8 eV (consensual value for TiO2 [42]).
Q14. Why did the GO/TiO2 samples have a heavy baseline shift?
Because of the low carbon content of the samples only the composite sample of 10 wt% GO/TiO2 and unsupported GO were investigated in detail.
Q15. What is the effect of the agitation on the activity of the composite?
Photocatalytic behavior of the model system prepared by agitation in the non-illuminated reaction mixture [A-GO/ TiO2 (Fig. 6)] indicated that long term stirring of the slurry in dark had significant negative effect on the activity of H2 formation in accordance with the supposed mechanical disintegration of the composite.
Q16. What is the method to get more information about the carbonaceous part of the fresh and?
In order to get further information exclusively about the carbonaceous part of the fresh and recovered samples, 13C solid state MAS NMR technique was chosen.