scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Identifying unprovoked thromboembolism patients at low risk for recurrence who can discontinue anticoagulant therapy

TLDR
Women with 0 or 1 risk factor may safely discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy after 6 months of therapy following a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism, and this criterion does not apply to men.
Abstract
Background: Whether to continue oral anticoagulant therapy beyond 6 months after an “unprovoked” venous thromboembolism is controversial. We sought to determine clinical predictors to identify patients who are at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism who could safely discontinue oral anticoagulants. Methods: In a multicentre prospective cohort study, 646 participants with a first, unprovoked major venous thromboembolism were enrolled over a 4-year period. Of these, 600 participants completed a mean 18-month follow-up in September 2006. We collected data for 69 potential predictors of recurrent venous thromboembolism while patients were taking oral anticoagulation therapy (5–7 months after initiation). During follow-up after discontinuing oral anticoagulation therapy, all episodes of suspected recurrent venous thromboembolism were independently adjudicated. We performed a multivariable analysis of predictor variables ( p Results: We identified 91 confirmed episodes of recurrent venous thromboembolism during follow-up after discontinuing oral anticoagulation therapy (annual risk 9.3%, 95% CI 7.7%–11.3%). Men had a 13.7% (95% CI 10.8%–17.0%) annual risk. There was no combination of clinical predictors that satisfied our criteria for identifying a low-risk subgroup of men. Fifty-two percent of women had 0 or 1 of the following characteristics: hyperpigmentation, edema or redness of either leg; D-dimer ≥ 250 μg/L while taking warfarin; body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ; or age ≥ 65 years. These women had an annual risk of 1.6% (95% CI 0.3%–4.6%). Women who had 2 or more of these findings had an annual risk of 14.1% (95% CI 10.9%–17.3%). Interpretation: Women with 0 or 1 risk factor may safely discontinue oral anticoagulant therapy after 6 months of therapy following a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism. This criterion does not apply to men. (http://Clinicaltrials.gov trial register number NCT00261014)

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism

TL;DR: Guidelines summarize and evaluate all available evidence at the time of the writing process, on a particular issue with the aim of assisting health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for an individual patient, with a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease.

TL;DR: It is shown that patients with symptomatic proximal DVT may benefit from fitted compression stockings for at least 3 months to reduce the incidence of the postthrombotic syndrome, and patients with VTE who receive adequate anticoagulation generally do not die of recurrent disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis.

TL;DR: The clinical course of a first episode of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis in a large consecutive series of patients who had long-term follow-up was assessed and the potential risk factors for these three outcomes were evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.

TL;DR: Qualitative standards that can be used to decide whether a prediction rule is suitable for adoption in a clinician's practice are described and applied to 33 reports of prediction rules.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of Recurrence After Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: A Population-Based Cohort Study

TL;DR: Survival after VTE, and especially after PE+/-DVT, is much worse than reported, and significantly less than expected survival, implying that treatment for the 2 disorders should be different.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis

TL;DR: Deep-vein thrombosis can be ruled out in a patient who is judged clinically unlikely to have deep-veIn thromBosis and who has a negative D-dimer test, and ultrasound testing can be safely omitted in such patients.
Related Papers (5)