scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Is there any potential management against COVID-19? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
All the included interventions significantly declined the mortality and enhanced clinical improvements with no effect on negative conversion and mechanical ventilation demand and especially, immunomodulators and plasma therapy showed favorable outcomes.
Abstract
A recent survey has shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has culminated in dramatical and critical treatment particularly in acute infected patients. In fact, this systematic review-meta-analysis was directly pertained to estimation at the efficient value of some clinical managements to confront the COVID-19 infection. Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Scholar databases were searched from inception to July 1, 2020, to identify studies reporting the current treatment process and medications (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, antiviral therapy, convalescent plasma, and immunomodulatory agents) for COVID-19. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The outcomes of this study were the frequency of negative conversion cases, clinical improvements, mechanical ventilation demand, intensive care unit (ICU) entry, and mortality. The standard treatment refers to the published guidelines and specialist experience which varies in different articles, and the proposed treatment refers to the kind of interest suggested in the included studies. A number of 45 articles met the eligibility criteria (out of 6793 articles). Among them, 26 articles involving 3263 patients were included in quantitative analysis. Anti-COVID-19 interventions could significantly increase clinical improvement (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08–1.27; I2 = 49.8%) and reduce the mortality rate (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.95; I2 = 74.8%). Although in terms of negative conversion, ICU entry, and mechanical ventilation demand, clinical intervention had no beneficial effect. The clinical effect of immunomodulatory agents (especially tocilizumab and anakinra) was noticeable compared to other medications with RR of 0.22 (95% CI 0.09–0.53; I2 = 40.9%) for mortality and 1.25 (95% CI 1.07–1.46; I2 = 45.4%) for clinical improvement. Moreover, Antivirals (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01–1.26; I2 = 47.0%) and convalescent plasma therapy (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.98; I2 = 66.6%) had significant beneficial effects on clinical improvement. Based on our findings, all the included interventions significantly declined the mortality and enhanced clinical improvements with no effect on negative conversion and mechanical ventilation demand. Especially, immunomodulators and plasma therapy showed favorable outcomes.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Safety and Efficacy of Convalescent Plasma in COVID-19: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors summarize the evidence from the available systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma (CP) in COVID-19 through an overview of the published systematic reviews (SRs).
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Tocilizumab in Reducing the Mortality Rate in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis aimed to assess TCZ effectiveness in reducing the mortality rate in COVID-19 patients was conducted. But, the authors found no statistically significant (p = 0.70) TCZ-related reduction of mortality regarding RCTs, while a significant reduction (log odds ratio = -0.41; 95% CI: -0., 0.68 −0.22, p < 0.001) was achieved regarding the observational studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19

TL;DR: In this article, the authors summarize the current evidence from the literature on the treatment of severe COVID-19 with convalescent plasma, and a concise overview of the hypothesized mechanisms of action is also presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anakinra for the treatment of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

TL;DR: The role of Anakinra in COVID-19 patients with elevated soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) remains unanswered, especially in patients receiving different forms of respiratory support as discussed by the authors .
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis

TL;DR: It is concluded that H and I2, which can usually be calculated for published meta-analyses, are particularly useful summaries of the impact of heterogeneity, and one or both should be presented in publishedMeta-an analyses in preference to the test for heterogeneity.
Book

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

TL;DR: The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of preparing and maintaining Cochrane systematic reviews on the effects of healthcare interventions.

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

TL;DR: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) as discussed by the authors was developed to assess the quality of nonrandomised studies with its design, content and ease of use directed to the task of incorporating the quality assessments in the interpretation of meta-analytic results.
Related Papers (5)