scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Is there any potential management against COVID-19? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
All the included interventions significantly declined the mortality and enhanced clinical improvements with no effect on negative conversion and mechanical ventilation demand and especially, immunomodulators and plasma therapy showed favorable outcomes.
Abstract
A recent survey has shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has culminated in dramatical and critical treatment particularly in acute infected patients. In fact, this systematic review-meta-analysis was directly pertained to estimation at the efficient value of some clinical managements to confront the COVID-19 infection. Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Scholar databases were searched from inception to July 1, 2020, to identify studies reporting the current treatment process and medications (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, antiviral therapy, convalescent plasma, and immunomodulatory agents) for COVID-19. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed to calculate the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The outcomes of this study were the frequency of negative conversion cases, clinical improvements, mechanical ventilation demand, intensive care unit (ICU) entry, and mortality. The standard treatment refers to the published guidelines and specialist experience which varies in different articles, and the proposed treatment refers to the kind of interest suggested in the included studies. A number of 45 articles met the eligibility criteria (out of 6793 articles). Among them, 26 articles involving 3263 patients were included in quantitative analysis. Anti-COVID-19 interventions could significantly increase clinical improvement (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08–1.27; I2 = 49.8%) and reduce the mortality rate (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35–0.95; I2 = 74.8%). Although in terms of negative conversion, ICU entry, and mechanical ventilation demand, clinical intervention had no beneficial effect. The clinical effect of immunomodulatory agents (especially tocilizumab and anakinra) was noticeable compared to other medications with RR of 0.22 (95% CI 0.09–0.53; I2 = 40.9%) for mortality and 1.25 (95% CI 1.07–1.46; I2 = 45.4%) for clinical improvement. Moreover, Antivirals (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01–1.26; I2 = 47.0%) and convalescent plasma therapy (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.98; I2 = 66.6%) had significant beneficial effects on clinical improvement. Based on our findings, all the included interventions significantly declined the mortality and enhanced clinical improvements with no effect on negative conversion and mechanical ventilation demand. Especially, immunomodulators and plasma therapy showed favorable outcomes.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters

Remdesivir as a possible therapeutic option for the COVID-19

TL;DR: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interleukin-1 blocking agents for treating COVID-19.

TL;DR: The effects of IL-1 blocking agents compared with standard care alone or with placebo on effectiveness and safety outcomes in people with COVID-19 are assessed and the certainty of evidence is rated using the GRADE approach for the critical outcomes of clinical improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Association between convalescent plasma treatment and mortality in COVID-19: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Cathrine Axfors, +230 more
TL;DR: In this article, the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials, were evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Interleukin-1 blocking agents for treating COVID-19

- 26 Jan 2022 - 
TL;DR: In this paper , the effects of IL-1 blocking agents compared with standard care alone or with placebo on effectiveness and safety outcomes in people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were assessed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Favipiravir, an antiviral for COVID-19?

TL;DR: An open-label non-randomized trial of 80 patients with COVID-19 in China identified a significant reduction in the time to SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance in patients treated with favipiravir compared with historical controls treated with lopinavir/ritonavir.
Journal ArticleDOI

Should chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine be used to treat COVID-19? A rapid review.

TL;DR: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether CQ/HCQ are safe and effective treatments for COVID-19, and high quality, adequately powered randomised clinical trials in primary and secondary care settings are urgently required to guide policymakers and clinicians.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current Drugs with Potential for Treatment of COVID-19: A Literature Review.

TL;DR: All examined treatments, although potentiality effective against COVID-19, need either appropriate drug development or clinical trial to be suitable for clinical use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy and safety of current therapeutic options for COVID-19 - lessons to be learnt from SARS and MERS epidemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Although a clear conclusion could be drawn for the recommendation of potential therapies for COVID-19 considering the very low quality of evidence and wide heterogeneity of interventions and indications, the results may help clinicians to comprehensively understand the advantages and drawbacks of each anti-coronavirus agents on efficacy and safety profiles.
Related Papers (5)