Learning with many irrelevant features

TLDR: It is shown that any learning algorithm implementing the MIN-FEATURES bias requires Θ(1/e ln 1/δ+ 1/e[2p + p ln n]) training examples to guarantee PAC-learning a concept having p relevant features out of n available features, and suggests that training data should be preprocessed to remove irrelevant features before being given to ID3 or FRINGE.

Abstract: In many domains, an appropriate inductive bias is the MIN-FEATURES bias, which prefers consistent hypotheses definable over as few features as possible. This paper defines and studies this bias. First, it is shown that any learning algorithm implementing the MIN-FEATURES bias requires Θ(1/e ln 1/δ+ 1/e[2p + p ln n]) training examples to guarantee PAC-learning a concept having p relevant features out of n available features. This bound is only logarithmic in the number of irrelevant features. The paper also presents a quasi-polynomial time algorithm, FOCUS, which implements MIN-FEATURES. Experimental studies are presented that compare FOCUS to the ID3 and FRINGE algorithms. These experiments show that-- contrary to expectations--these algorithms do not implement good approximations of MIN-FEATURES. The coverage, sample complexity, and generalization performance of FOCUS is substantially better than either ID3 or FRINGE on learning problems where the MIN-FEATURES bias is appropriate. This suggests that, in practical applications, training data should be preprocessed to remove irrelevant features before being given to ID3 or FRINGE.