Lithospheric structure of Iberia and Morocco using finite-frequency Rayleigh wave tomography from earthquakes and seismic ambient noise
read more
Citations
Crustal structure and evolution of the Pyrenean-Cantabrian belt: A review and new interpretations from recent concepts and data
Lithosphere structure in Europe from thermal isostasy
Curie Point Depth of the Iberian Peninsula and Surrounding Margins. A Thermal and Tectonic Perspective of its Evolution
A common deep source for upper-mantle upwellings below the Ibero-western Maghreb region from teleseismic P-wave travel-time tomography
Fast dismantling of a mountain belt by mantle flow: Late-orogenic evolution of Pyrenees and Liguro-Provençal rifting
References
Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes
Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements
On the regional variation of heat flow, geotherms, and lithospheric thickness☆
Computer Programs in Seismology: An Evolving Tool for Instruction and Research
Tectonics and plate tectonics model for the Variscan belt of Europe
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What is the first step for ambient noise tomography?
The first step for ambient noise tomography is the determination of empirical Green’s functions by cross correlating and stacking continuous recordings of all the potential station pairs.
Q3. What is the lithosphere under the Pyrenees?
The lithosphere is 90 km deep under the Pyrenees and Iberian Chain and thins eastward and southward under the Mediterranean, reaching a minimum thickness of 50 km under the southern Valencia Trough.
Q4. How did the authors obtain the phase velocity maps?
the authors applied a finite-frequency tomographic inversion [Barmin et al., 2001] to the selected phase velocity measurements between 4 and 40 s periods to obtain fundamental-mode Rayleigh-wave phase velocity maps on a 0.58 3 0.58 grid across the study area.
Q5. What is the common method used to obtain a velocity model from the surface to 200 km?
To obtain a velocity model from the surface to 200 km depth, the authors did Rayleigh wave tomography using both ambient noise and teleseismic earthquakes.
Q6. How many iterations did the authors run at each grid node?
The authors ran 30 iterations at each grid node with a starting Vs model that consists of a homogenous layer with velocity Vs 5 4.4 km/s down to 200 km depth.
Q7. How is the fundamental mode Rayleigh wave isolated from other modes?
The fundamental mode Rayleigh wave is isolated from other modes and body waves by windowing filtered records with a variable length tapered window.
Q8. What is the proxy for the depth of the mantle?
One proxy is to take the depth of the strongest negative velocity gradient (first derivative with respect to depth) at the base of the high-velocity mantle lid [e.g., Li et al., 2003; Priestley and Debayle, 2003].
Q9. What is the origin of the Si-poor basalts?
Replacement of delaminating lithosphere by asthenosphere results in decompression melting (Figure 8b), the source of the Si-poor basalts.
Q10. What is the current convergence rate of the Alpine-Himalayan belt?
This area, the far western end of the Alpine-Himalayan orogenic belt, is currently affected by the Africa-Eurasia convergence with deformation extending from the Pyrenees in the north of Iberia to the Atlas Mountains in Morocco.
Q11. How many times have the authors obtained phase velocity maps of fundamental mode Rayleigh waves?
The authors have obtained phase velocity maps of fundamental mode Rayleigh waves between 4 and 40 s from cross correlation of seismic ambient noise.
Q12. What is the reason for the thinning of the lithosphere?
The authors attribute this to viscous removal of the bottom of the lithosphere by the descending Alboran plate [Tao and O’Connell, 1992; Levander et al., 2014].
Q13. Where are the lowest shear velocities in the upper mantle?
The lowest shear velocities in the upper mantle are observed beneath the High and Middle Atlas, and in the area east of the Betics extending through the Valencia trough and to the northeastern coast of Iberia.
Q14. How did the authors invert the dispersion curve?
Then the authors inverted the dispersion curve using as initial model the one used to create the synthetic curve (Figure 7a) and using the same 1-D shear velocity model used to invert the data presented in this manuscript (Figure 7b).
Q15. What is the path density at all periods?
The path density is high at all periods (Figure 2b), and the azimuthal distribution of events is good, with the largest number of events coming from the northeast and the lowest from the SSE (Figure 2a).
Q16. What is the average interstation spacing in the Atlas Mountains?
Average interstation spacing is approximately 60 km (Figure 1b) with almost uniform coverage across Iberia and northern Morocco, but less regular coverage in the Middle and High Atlas Mountains.