Journal ArticleDOI
Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Practical recommendations on mentoring in medicine that are evidence-based will require studies using more rigorous methods, addressing contextual issues, and using cross-disciplinary approaches.Abstract:
ContextMentoring, as a partnership in personal and professional growth and development, is central to academic medicine, but it is challenged by increased clinical, administrative, research, and other educational demands on medical faculty. Therefore, evidence for the value of mentoring needs to be evaluated.ObjectiveTo systematically review the evidence about the prevalence of mentorship and its relationship to career development.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Current Contents, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases from the earliest available date to May 2006.Study Selection and Data ExtractionWe identified all studies evaluating the effect of mentoring on career choices and academic advancement among medical students and physicians. Minimum inclusion criteria were a description of the study population and availability of extractable data. No restrictions were placed on study methods or language.Data SynthesisThe literature search identified 3640 citations. Review of abstracts led to retrieval of 142 full-text articles for assessment; 42 articles describing 39 studies were selected for review. Of these, 34 (87%) were cross-sectional self-report surveys with small sample size and response rates ranging from 5% to 99%. One case-control study nested in a survey used a comparison group that had not received mentoring, and 1 cohort study had a small sample size and a large loss to follow-up. Less than 50% of medical students and in some fields less than 20% of faculty members had a mentor. Women perceived that they had more difficulty finding mentors than their colleagues who are men. Mentorship was reported to have an important influence on personal development, career guidance, career choice, and research productivity, including publication and grant success.ConclusionsMentoring is perceived as an important part of academic medicine, but the evidence to support this perception is not strong. Practical recommendations on mentoring in medicine that are evidence-based will require studies using more rigorous methods, addressing contextual issues, and using cross-disciplinary approaches.read more
Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
The Surgical Workplace Learning Environment: Integrating Coaching and Mentoring
Jeanne L. Koehler,Emily C. Sturm +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide insight into workplace learning, the roles of mentors and coaches in development, and strategies for embedding authentic coaching and mentoring within a surgical education setting.
Journal ArticleDOI
How to Effectively Mentor Junior Faculty
TL;DR: Faculty mentoring is a dynamic reciprocal relationship for both the mentor and mentee to work closely in developing a professional and productive academic partnership in which the mentoring progresses and feedback are closely monitored.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Mentorship Program for Academic Obstetrician Gynecologists that Improved Publication and Overall Confidence for Success.
Susan Hosseini Nasab,John S. Rushing,James H. Segars,Emily Evers,Victoria L. Handa,Shari M. Lawson,Colleen Miller,Gayane Yenokyan,Jessica L. Bienstock,Andrew J. Satin +9 more
TL;DR: This subspecialty-tailored, departmental training program was effective in increasing junior faculty and clinical fellows' confidence in skills related to career advancement and research and in the number of peer-reviewed publications.
Journal ArticleDOI
Mentoring in Global Cancer Research Training.
Amr S. Soliman,Robert M. Chamberlain,Robert M. Chamberlain,Arthur M. Michalek,Joseph F. O'Donnell,Richard E. Gallagher +5 more
TL;DR: The Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations (CEESP) Program as discussed by the authors provides research training in global and US minority settings, and the focus of this manuscript is on public health research based on our experiences with the CEESP Program which is further illustrated in this Supplement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Gender Authorship Trends Among Craniofacial Publications: A 20-Year Analysis.
TL;DR: Although female authorship has increased significantly over the last 2 decades, women remain a minority within the craniofacial literature and further research is needed to elicit the root of these disparities.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective
TL;DR: In this paper, a power perspective is used to examine the linkage between diversity and mentorship in work organizations and the consequences associated with diversified and homogeneous relationships are examined using a dyadic approach.
Journal ArticleDOI
Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success.
TL;DR: This paper used structural equation modeling to investigate relationships among proteges' personality characteristics, initiation of mentoring, mentoring received, and career success for 147 managers and p... and p...
Journal ArticleDOI
Leadership styles, mentoring functions received, and job‐related stress: a conceptual model and preliminary study
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined linkages between mentor leadership behaviors (laissez-faire, transactional contingent reward, and transformational), protege perception of mentoring functions received (career development and psychosocial support) and job-related stress of 204 mentor-protege dyads.
Journal ArticleDOI
How important are role models in making good doctors
TL;DR: Whether role models can still be an effective means of imparting professional values, attitudes, and behaviours in a health service that is increasingly sensitive to society's expectations is considered.
Journal ArticleDOI
The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: A meta-analytical review of the literature
TL;DR: In this paper, a quantitative meta-analytic review provides a critical analysis of the effectiveness of mentoring, with an emphasis on research designs that compared career outcomes of mentored individuals to non-mentored individuals.