scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications

TLDR
In this paper, the authors introduce the concept of National Systems of Entrepreneurship and provide an approach to characterizing them, which are fundamentally resource allocation systems that are driven by individual-level opportunity pursuit, through the creation of new ventures, with this activity and its outcomes regulated by country-specific institutional characteristics.
Abstract
We introduce a novel concept of National Systems of Entrepreneurship and provide an approach to characterizing them. National Systems of Entrepreneurship are fundamentally resource allocation systems that are driven by individual-level opportunity pursuit, through the creation of new ventures, with this activity and its outcomes regulated by country-specific institutional characteristics. In contrast with the institutional emphasis of the National Systems of Innovation frameworks, where institutions engender and regulate action, National Systems of Entrepreneurship are driven by individuals, with institutions regulating who acts and the outcomes of individual action. Building on these principles, we also introduce a novel index methodology to characterizing National Systems of Entrepreneurship. The distinctive features of the methodology are: (1) systemic approach, which allows interactions between components of National Systems of Entrepreneurship; (2) the Penalty for Bottleneck feature, which identifies bottleneck factors that hold back system performance; (3) contextualization, which recognizes that national entrepreneurship processes are always embedded in a given country’s institutional framework.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dissecting the ecosystems’ determinants of entrepreneurial re-entry after a business failure

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate the role of entrepreneurial ecosystems conditions (formal, informal and social capital) on different types of entrepreneurial re-entry at a global scale by building a panel of data of 54 economies covering different (advanced and emerging) countries across the globe during the period 2004-2017.
Journal ArticleDOI

Small Entrepreneurship, Knowledge and Social Resources in a Heavy Industrial Territory. The Case of Eco-Innovations in Dunkirk, North of France

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyze the capacity of the small entrepreneur to innovate and especially eco-innovations, and identify which resources (in knowledge, financial, and social resources) they are using to develop new products and technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ecosistema y actividad emprendedora en México: Un análisis exploratorio

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the role of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the entrepreneurial activity and regional development in the Central West region of Mexico and show how certain elements of the ecosystem have influenced in the configuration of an entrepreneurial diversity (rural-urban, technological-no technological, familiar-no familiar).
Journal ArticleDOI

Orchestrating a new industrial field. The case of the Finnish wood-based bioeconomy

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on how companies and institutions interact and cooperate in order to develop the wood-based bioeconomy field and argue that this interaction has produced a new type of complementarity between companies and organizations facilitating the development of the new industrial field.
Journal ArticleDOI

A new comparative model for national innovation systems based on machine learning classification techniques

TL;DR: This study aims to cluster and classify national innovation systems (NISs) dynamically based on analysing the structural differences among NISs’ dimensions and shows a high level of similarity between clusters and the economic and innovation reality in studied countries.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The theory of planned behavior

TL;DR: Ajzen, 1985, 1987, this article reviewed the theory of planned behavior and some unresolved issues and concluded that the theory is well supported by empirical evidence and that intention to perform behaviors of different kinds can be predicted with high accuracy from attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control; and these intentions, together with perceptions of behavioral control, account for considerable variance in actual behavior.
Book

Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

TL;DR: Douglass C. North as discussed by the authors developed an analytical framework for explaining the ways in which institutions and institutional change affect the performance of economies, both at a given time and over time.
Book

The theory of economic development

TL;DR: Buku ini memberikan infmasi tentang aliran melingkar kehidupan ekonomi sebagaimana dikondisikan oleh keadaan tertentu, fenomena fundamental dari pembangunan EKonomi, kredit, laba wirausaha, bunga atas modal, and siklus bisnis as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors draw upon previous research conducted in the different social science disciplines and applied fields of business to create a conceptual framework for the field of entrepreneurship, and predict a set of outcomes not explained or predicted by conceptual frameworks already in existence in other fields.
Book

Theory of Economic Development

TL;DR: The theory of economic development was first published in 1911 by Schumpeter as discussed by the authors, who argued that economics is a natural self-regulating mechanism when undisturbed by "social and other meddlers." In his preface he argues that despite weaknesses, theories are based on logic and provide structure for understanding fact.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
What are national business systems?

National Systems of Entrepreneurship are resource allocation systems driven by individual opportunity pursuit in creating ventures, regulated by country-specific institutions, distinct from National Systems of Innovation.