scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model.

TLDR
It may be time to consider a shift to a dimensional classification of personality disorder that would help address the failures of the existing diagnostic categories as well as contribute to an integration of the psychiatric diagnostic manual with psychology's research on general personality structure.
Abstract
The diagnostic categories of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders were developed in the spirit of a traditional medical model that considers mental disorders to be qualitatively distinct conditions (see, e.g., American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Work is now beginning on the fifth edition of this influential diagnostic manual. It is perhaps time to consider a fundamental shift in how psychopathology is conceptualized and diagnosed. More specifically, it may be time to consider a shift to a dimensional classification of personality disorder that would help address the failures of the existing diagnostic categories as well as contribute to an integration of the psychiatric diagnostic manual with psychology's research on general personality structure.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Representing schizotypal thinking with dimensional traits: A case for the Five Factor Schizotypal Inventory.

TL;DR: Strong relations across the 3 measures of traits relevant to STAP are revealed, supporting the validity of the FFSI-SF and providing additional support for view that schizotypal thinking can be well-captured by personality dimensions that run continuously across normal and pathological levels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of the Structured DSM-5 Clinical Interview for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale With the Structured Interview of Personality Organization.

TL;DR: Based on videotaped assessments of 30 psychotherapeutic in- and outpatients with both instruments, significant correlations between overall scores and domain scales of the two interviews were found and the ratings from both interviews showed high correlations with criteria of clinical severity.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Construct validity in psychological tests.

TL;DR: The present interpretation of construct validity is not "official" and deals with some areas where the Committee would probably not be unanimous, but the present writers are solely responsible for this attempt to explain the concept and elaborate its implications.
Related Papers (5)