scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TLDR
The overall prevalence of OPMD worldwide was 4.47%, and males were more frequently affected by these disorders, and the prevalence differs between populations; therefore, further population-based studies may contribute to the better understanding of these differences.
Abstract
Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) are chronic conditions, which have a higher risk of transformation to oral squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to answer the question: "What is the prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders among adults?" Studies reporting the prevalence of these conditions (leukoplakia, erythroplakia, oral submucous fibrosis [OSMF], and actinic cheilitis) were selected, only studies in which a clinical assessment and histopathological confirmation were performed were included. Of the 5513 studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The risk of bias (RoB) of the selected studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Seven studies were classified as high risk, 12 as moderate risk, and 3 as low RoB. The meta-analysis showed that the prevalence of OPMD was 4.47% (95% CI = 2.43-7.08). The most prevalent OPMDs were OSMF (4.96%; 95% CI = 2.28-8.62) and leukoplakia (4.11%; 95% CI = 1.98-6.97). OPMDs were identified more commonly in males (59.99%; 95% CI = 41.27-77.30). Asian and South American/Caribbean populations had the highest prevalence rates of 10.54% (95% CI = 4.60-18.55) and 3.93% (95% CI = 2.43-5.77), respectively. The overall prevalence of OPMD worldwide was 4.47%, and males were more frequently affected by these disorders. The prevalence of OPMD differs between populations; therefore, further population-based studies may contribute to the better understanding of these differences.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Oral potentially malignant disorders: A comprehensive review on clinical aspects and management

TL;DR: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) include a group of conditions that affect the oral mucosa with an increased risk of malignancy and up to a third of OPMDs may transform to squamous cell carcinomas.
Journal ArticleDOI

Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: systematic review and meta‐analysis of the last 5 years

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors performed a bibliographic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases with keywords "oral leukoplakia", "oral cancer", ''oral carcinoma" and ''oral squamous cell carcinoma''.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.

TL;DR: The PRISMA-P checklist as mentioned in this paper provides 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol, as well as a model example from an existing published protocol.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer

TL;DR: This review presents data on incidence, mortality, survival and trends in cancers of the lip, oral cavity and oropharynx using available recent data sources around the world to gain insight into the geographic variations in the incidence of this cancer in the globe.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa

TL;DR: The terminology presented in this report reflects the best understanding of multi-step carcinogenesis in the oral mucosa, and aspires to engender consistency in use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias

TL;DR: The use of checklists like PRISMA is likely to improve the reporting quality of a systematic review and provides substantial transparency in the selection process of papers in a systematicreview.
Journal ArticleDOI

An international registry of systematic-review protocols.

TL;DR: The aim is for the registry to include details of all ongoing systematic reviews with a health-related outcome in the broadest sense, and will encompass systematic reviews of health-care interventions, and reviews of the social determinants of health, of service delivery, and of risk factors and genetic associations.
Related Papers (5)