scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Program FACTOR at 10 : origins, development and future directions

Pere Joan Ferrando Piera, +1 more
- 01 May 2017 - 
- Vol. 29, Iss: 2, pp 236-240
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A conceptual view of the origins, development and future directions of FACTOR, a popular free program for fitting the factor analysis (FA) model, which has attained a degree of technical development comparable to commercial software, and offers options not available elsewhere.
Abstract
espanolAntecedentes: se pretende dar una vision conceptual del origen, desarrollos y futuras lineas de investigacion de FACTOR, un popular programa no comercial de analisis factorial (AF). Metodo: el estudio se organiza en tres partes. En la primera se discute FACTOR en su etapa inicial (2006-2012) como un programa AF tradicional con opciones novedosas. En la segunda se discute la etapa actual (2013-2016) en la que FACTOR se presenta ya como un programa general enmarcado tanto en los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales como en la teoria de respuesta a los items. En la tercera parte, finalmente se discute la esperada evolucion futura del programa. Resultados: en la actualidad FACTOR ha alcanzado un grado de desarrollo tecnico comparable al software comercial, ofreciendo opciones no disponibles en otros programas. Discusion: se discuten algunas limitaciones, asi como varios puntos que requieren cambios o mejoras. Se discute tambien el funcionamiento del programa dentro de la comunidad de usuarios. EnglishBackground: We aim to provide a conceptual view of the origins, development and future directions of FACTOR, a popular free program for fitting the factor analysis (FA) model. Method: The study is organized into three parts. In the first part we discuss FACTOR in its initial period (2006-2012) as a traditional FA program with many new and cutting-edge features. The second part discusses the present period (2013-2016) in which FACTOR has developed into a comprehensive program embedded in the framework of structural equation modelling and item response theory. The third part discusses expected future developments. Results: at present FACTOR has attained a degree of technical development comparable to commercial software, and offers options not available elsewhere. Discussion: We discuss several shortcomings as well as points that require changes or improvements. We also discuss the functioning of FACTOR within its community of users.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring a New Stress Domain: Validation of the Couple-Level Minority Stress Scale

TL;DR: The Couple-Level Minority Stress (CLMS) scale is introduced, featuring eight new couple-level minority stress factors that have great potential to extend and enrich minority stress research, particularly studies that deepen understandings of longstanding health inequities based on sexual orientation.
Journal ArticleDOI

In (deficit) schizophrenia, a general cognitive decline (G-CoDe) partly mediates the effects of neuro-immune and neuro-oxidative toxicity on the symptomatome and quality of life.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined whether a general factor underpins impairments in key Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) probes, verbal fluency test (VFT), world list memory (WLM), True Recall, and mini mental state examination (MMSE).
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing demoralization in medically ill patients: Factor structure of the Italian version of the demoralization scale and development of short versions with the item response theory framework.

TL;DR: The psychometric properties of the 24-item Italian version of the Demoralization Scale (DS-24) among medically ill inpatients are investigated, and shorter versions for screening are developed to aid clinicians in identifying demoralized patients in hospital settings.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

TL;DR: Principles for reporting analyses using structural equation modeling are reviewed, and it is recommended that every report give a detailed justification of the model used, along with plausible alternatives and an account of identifiability.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models

TL;DR: Bifactor latent structures were introduced over 70 years ago, but only recently has bifactor modeling been rediscovered as an effective approach to modeling construct-relevant multidimensionality in a set of ordered categorical item responses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling: An Integration of the Best Features of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

TL;DR: ESEM, an overarching integration of the best aspects of CFA/SEM and traditional EFA, provides confirmatory tests of a priori factor structures, relations between latent factors and multigroup/multioccasion tests of full (mean structure) measurement invariance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items With Parallel Analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors considered the most appropriate parallel analysis procedure to assess the number of common factors underlying ordered polytomously scored variables, and proposed minimum rank factor analysis (MRFA) as an extraction method, rather than the currently applied principal component analysis (PCA) and principal axes factoring.
Journal ArticleDOI

Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences

TL;DR: The role of latent variables in multiple regression, probit and logistic regression, factor analysis, latent curve models, item response theory, latent class analysis, and structural equation models is reviewed.