scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Safety and efficacy of sunitinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, phase II study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Sunitinib showed pronounced toxicities at a dose of 50 mg/day in patients with unresectable HCC and the response rate was low, and the study did not meet the primary endpoint based on RECIST criteria.
Abstract
Summary Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumour spread is partly dependent on neoangiogenesis. In this open-label, multicentre, phase II trial done in Europe and Asia, sunitinib, a multitargeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenic properties, was assessed in patients with advanced unresectable HCC. Methods Between February and July, 2006, eligible patients were enrolled and treated with repeated cycles of oral sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment). The primary endpoint of this Simon two-stage phase II trial was objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria, with an expected response rate of 15%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00247676. Findings Of 37 patients enrolled, one (2·7%) patient experienced a confirmed partial response, giving an overall objective response rate of 2·7% (95% CI 0·1–14·2); on the basis of this, the trial did not proceed to the second stage. 13 (35%) of 37 patients achieved stable disease for over 3 months. Commonly observed grade 3 and 4 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (14 of 37; 37·8%), neutropenia (nine of 37; 24·3%), asthenia (five of 37; 13·5%), hand–foot syndrome (four of 37; 10·8%), and anaemia (four of 37; 10·8%). There were four deaths among the 37 patients (10·8%) that were possibly related to treatment. Interpretation Sunitinib showed pronounced toxicities at a dose of 50 mg/day in patients with unresectable HCC. The response rate was low, and the study did not meet the primary endpoint based on RECIST criteria. Funding Pfizer Oncology.

read more

Citations
More filters

EASL-EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma European Association for the Study of the Liver ⇑ , European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

TL;DR: The purpose of this document is to assist physicians, patients, health-care providers, and health-policy makers from Europe and worldwide in the decision-making process according to evidencebased data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

TL;DR: Studies now aim to identify molecular markers and imaging techniques that can detect patients with HCC at earlier stages and better predict their survival time and response to treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of signaling pathways in the development and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

TL;DR: The role of the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, WNT/β-catenin pathway, insulin-like growth factor pathway, hepatocyte growth factor/c-MET pathway and growth factor-regulated angiogenic signaling are explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the genomic era

TL;DR: The authors summarize the molecular concepts of progression, discuss the potential reasons for clinical trial failure and propose new concepts of drug development, which might lead to clinical implementation of emerging targeted agents.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Global cancer statistics

TL;DR: A substantial proportion of the worldwide burden of cancer could be prevented through the application of existing cancer control knowledge and by implementing programs for tobacco control, vaccination, and early detection and treatment, as well as public health campaigns promoting physical activity and a healthier dietary intake.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global cancer statistics, 2002.

TL;DR: There are striking variations in the risk of different cancers by geographic area, most of the international variation is due to exposure to known or suspected risk factors related to lifestyle or environment, and provides a clear challenge to prevention.
Journal ArticleDOI

New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid Tumors

TL;DR: A model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment is proposed, which is largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines.
Related Papers (5)