Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE
Ben Greiner
- Vol. 1, Iss: 1, pp 114-125
TLDR
This paper discusses aspects of recruiting subjects for economic laboratory experiments, and shows how the Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments can help.Abstract:
This paper discusses aspects of recruiting subjects for economic laboratory experiments, and shows how the Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments can help. The software package provides experimenters with a free, convenient, and very powerful tool to organize their experiments and sessions.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Prolific.ac—A subject pool for online experiments
TL;DR: This article presents www.prolific.ac and lays out its suitability for recruiting subjects for social and economic science experiments, and traces the platform’s historical development, present its features, and contrast them with requirements for different types of social andEconomic experiments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Lying Aversion and the Size of the Lie
TL;DR: Gneezy et al. as discussed by the authors presented a model of lying costs that generates hypotheses regarding behavior and found that the highest fraction of lies are from reporting the maximal outcome, but some participants do not make the maximal lie.
Journal ArticleDOI
Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a new solution concept: a mechanism is obviously strategy-proof (OSP) if it has an equilibrium in obviously dominant strategies, i.e., a strategy is obviously dominant if and only if a cognitively limited agent can recognize it as weakly dominant.
Posted Content
Preferences for Truth-Telling
TL;DR: The authors show that people lie surprisingly little and formalize a wide range of potential explanations for the observed behavior, identify testable predictions that can distinguish between the models and conduct new experiments to do so.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conducting interactive experiments online
TL;DR: It is concluded that data quality for interactive experiments via the Internet is adequate and reliable, making online interactive experimentation a potentially valuable complement to laboratory studies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Do Lab Experiments Misrepresent Social Preferences? The Case of Self-Selected Student Samples
TL;DR: The authors empirically investigate whether laboratory experiments with student samples misrepresent the importance of social preferences and find that students who exhibit stronger prosocial inclinations in an unrelated field donation are not more likely to participate in experiments.
Journal ArticleDOI
Risk Attitudes, Randomization to Treatment, and Self-Selection Into Experiments
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the common use of non-stochastic show-up fees can generate samples that are more risk averse than would otherwise have been observed, but that it does not affect the demographic mix of risk attitudes in the sample.
Journal ArticleDOI
Selection Bias, Demographic Effects and Ability Effects in Common Value Auction Experiments
TL;DR: The authors found that inexperienced women are much more susceptible to the winner's curse than men, controlling for SAT/ACT scores and college major, and economics and business majors substantially overbid relative to other majors.