Q2. What are the future works in this paper?
The authors feel that this set of ideas, which are in need of further experimental testing, provides a useful and attractive framework for designing more detailed process models of word finding in human speakers.
Q3. What is the new assumption that the authors are forced to make?
The new assumption the authors are forced to make is that there are lexical processing units corresponding to their pre-phonological Ll-items.
Q4. What is the effect of the change in a SV response?
If SV responses do not involve any action processing of a lexical nature, then shifting towards a new set of action names will not be expected to disrupt performance, except for some deterioration due to temporary factors such as distraction or loss of concentration.
Q5. What is the locus of typicality and level of abstraction effects?
The locus of typicality and level of abstraction effects, accordiig to tlhe standard interpretation in the literature, is the name retrieval stage.
Q6. What is the effect of the new model?
In sum, the new model predicts a substantial disruption of performance in both SV and VS reaction times following the transition to new verbs.