scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Using Implementation Mapping to develop protocols supporting the implementation of a state policy on screening children for Adverse Childhood Experiences in a system of health centers in inland Southern California

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This paper describes how Implementation Mapping was used to engage diverse stakeholders and guide them through a systematic process that resulted in the development of the implementation strategy, and details how the EPIS framework informed each implementation strategy Task and provides recommendations for developing implementation strategies using EPIS and implementation Mapping in health-care settings.
Abstract
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) are defined as traumatic events occurring before age 18, such as maltreatment, life-threatening accidents, harsh migration experiences, or violence. Screening for ACEs includes asking questions about an individual's early exposure to these types of events. ACEs screenings have potential value in identifying children exposed to chronic and significant stress that produces elevated cortisol levels (i.e., toxic stress), and its associated physical and mental health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, depression, asthma, ADHD, anxiety, and substance dependence. However, ACEs screenings are seldom used in primary care settings. The Surgeon General of California has addressed this care gap by introducing ACEs Aware, an ACEs screening fee-for-service healthcare policy signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Since January 2020, Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid health care program, has reimbursed primary care providers for using the Pediatric ACEs and Related Life-events Screener (PEARLS) tool to screen children and adults for ACEs during wellness visits. To achieve the goals set by the ACEs Aware state policy, it is essential to develop and test implementation strategies that are informed by the values, priorities, and resources of clinical settings, healthcare professionals, and end-users. To address this need, we partnered with a system of federally qualified health centers in Southern California on a pilot study to facilitate the implementation of ACEs screenings in five community-based clinics. The health centers had broad ideas for an implementation strategy, as well as best practices to improve adoption of screenings, such as focusing on staff training to improve clinic workflow. This knowledge was incorporated into the development of an implementation strategy template, used at the outset of this study. We used the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework to guide the study and inform a participatory planning process called Implementation Mapping. In this paper, we describe how Implementation Mapping was used to engage diverse stakeholders and guide them through a systematic process that resulted in the development of the implementation strategy. We also detail how the EPIS framework informed each Implementation Mapping Task and provide recommendations for developing implementation strategies using EPIS and Implementation Mapping in health-care settings.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors propose a perspective foregrounded in the concept of co-creation to guide the structuring of implementation collaboratives through five principles, including the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic Review: Process of Forming Academic Service Partnerships to Reform Clinical Education

TL;DR: This study’s findings can provide practical guidelines to steer partnership programs within the academic and clinical bodies, with the aim of providing a collaborative partnership approach to clinical education.
Journal ArticleDOI

A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.

TL;DR: The ERIC study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors.

TL;DR: A multi-level, four phase model of the implementation process, derived from extant literature, is proposed and applied to public sector services and highlights features of the model likely to be particularly important in each phase, while considering the outer and inner contexts of public sector service systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting

TL;DR: This work proposes guidelines for naming, defining, and operationalizing implementation strategies in terms of seven dimensions: actor, the action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes addressed, and theoretical justification.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Benefits Of Health Information Technology: A Review Of The Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results

TL;DR: The recent literature on health information technology was reviewed to determine its effect on outcomes, including quality, efficiency, and provider satisfaction, and found that the benefits of the technology are beginning to emerge in smaller practices and organizations, as well as in large organizations that were early adopters.
Related Papers (5)