Q2. What are the future works in "Who times the foreign exchange market? corporate speculation and ceo characteristics∗" ?
There are other related open questions left for future research. This is certainly plausible for the compensation variables, which may be good proxies for the overall compensation policy of management.
Q3. What is the frequent choice in the corporate risk management literature?
Scaling the notional amount of derivatives by total assets is the most frequent choice in the corporate risk management literature (e.g., Graham and Rogers, 2002; Knopf, Nam and Thornton, 2002).
Q4. What is the common explanation behind the negative sign of the age and the working experience of the CEO?
A possible common explanation behind the negative sign of the age and the working experience of the CEO could be overconfidence, in line with the argument of Gervais and Odean (2001).
Q5. what could be the rationale for selective hedging?
This discussion highlights that several managerial biases - representativeness, mental accounting, loss aversion and overconfidence - could rationalize selective hedging.
Q6. What is the significance of the insignificant finding on corporate governance?
The insignificant finding on corporate governance was somewhat expected, given that the speculative behavior the authors identify is likely to depend on behavioral biases of the CEO, rather than on a misalignment of incentives between managers and shareholders.
Q7. What does the standard agency model argue that managers have?
These models argue that managers are opportunistic and have some discretion inside the firm that they can use to alter corporate decisions in favor of their own objectives.
Q8. What are the main factors that affect the incentives to speculate?
The age, tenure and previous working experience of the manager can affect the incentives to speculate not only through overconfidence but also for reasons related to carrier and reputation concerns, skill, or risk aversion directly.