scispace - formally typeset
D

David P. Farrington

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  872
Citations -  70561

David P. Farrington is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Juvenile delinquency. The author has an hindex of 136, co-authored 839 publications receiving 65241 citations. Previous affiliations of David P. Farrington include University of Minnesota & Queen Mary University of London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Protective factors for violence: Results from the Pittsburgh Youth Study

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated risk-based and interactive factors for violence in the Pittsburgh Youth Study (PYS) and found that high academic achievement was consistently associated with low levels of violence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evidence-based Crime Prevention: The Effectiveness of CCTV

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors report on the findings of a systematic review, incorporating meta-analytic techniques, of the highest quality available research evidence on the effects of CCTV on crime in public space.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex offenders and sex offending in the Cambridge study in delinquent development: prevalence, frequency, specialization, recidivism, and (dis)continuity over the life-course

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the extent to which distinct types of offenders display similar patterns on key criminal career dimensions, focusing on sex offenders using longitudinal data from a cohort of South London males participating in the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development.
Book ChapterDOI

The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential (ICAP) Theory

TL;DR: This chapter describes an empirical test of the integrated cognitive antisocial potential (ICAP) theory based on the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development (CSDD), and concludes that predictions from the ICAP theory have generally been supported.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bullying prevention programs: the importance of peer intervention, disciplinary methods and age variations

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bullying prevention programs was conducted, which showed that although peer support schemes appear effective based on attitudinal surveys, these schemes are not related to actual levels of bullying or victimization and are quite often related to an increase in bullying and victimization.