G. Faluvegi

TL;DR: The authors used a global climate model to compare the effectiveness of many climate forcing agents for producing climate change and found that replacing traditional instantaneous and adjusted forcings with an easily computed alternative, Fs, yields a better predictor of climate change, i.e., its efficacies are closer to unity.

TL;DR: There is no evidence for an efficacy effect on historical GSAT trend estimates based on simulations with an impulse response model, nor on the resulting estimates of climate sensitivity derived from the historical period.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the influence of different climate drivers on the Arctic's response to changes in greenhouse gases, aerosols, and other climate drivers, and find that SO₄ perturbations produce a slightly stronger precipitation response than the other drivers, particularly compared to CO₂.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate how integrated water vapour responds to different drivers of climate change, such as greenhouse gases andaerosols, by quantifying changes in atmospheric water vapours lifetime.

TL;DR: Sillmann et al. as discussed by the authors used model simulations to examine the effect of sulfate aerosols and black carbon compared to greenhouse gases on global mean precipitation and extreme precipitation events, using indicators for dry extremes as well as for moderate and very extreme precipitation.