scispace - formally typeset
L

Luis M. Ruilope

Researcher at European University of Madrid

Publications -  891
Citations -  109166

Luis M. Ruilope is an academic researcher from European University of Madrid. The author has contributed to research in topics: Blood pressure & Renal function. The author has an hindex of 94, co-authored 841 publications receiving 97778 citations. Previous affiliations of Luis M. Ruilope include Lund University & Mayo Clinic.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Pos-350 finerenone in mild to severe chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: the fidelity prespecified pooled analysis

TL;DR: In this article , the authors evaluated the effects of finerenone on composite kidney and cardiovascular endpoints in varying stages of CKD (defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR]).
Journal ArticleDOI

407-P: Efficacy of Finerenone in Patients with Abnormal Markers of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis—A FIDELITY Subgroup Analysis

TL;DR: In this paper , finerenone, a selective, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, showed cardiorenal benefits vs placebo in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Main Issues for Achieving Blood Pressure Goals

TL;DR: The demonstration that arterial hypertension is the number one risk factor in promoting death in developed as well as in developing countries fits well with the concept of JNC 7; however, the fact that prehypertension may correlate well with insulin resistance forces the consideration that the benefit of simply lowering BP may not be enough to correct the risk of elevated BP.
Journal ArticleDOI

Erratum. Finerenone in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes According to Baseline HbA1c and Insulin Use: An Analysis From the FIDELIO-DKD Study. Diabetes Care 2022;45:888-897.

TL;DR: In this article , the hazard ratio (HR) of the key secondary composite kidney outcome in the insulin at baseline subgroup was incorrectly reported as 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.94) instead of the correct HR of 0.77 (95 % 0.62 − 0.94).