N
Nancy R. LaPelle
Researcher at University of Massachusetts Medical School
Publications - 30
Citations - 6553
Nancy R. LaPelle is an academic researcher from University of Massachusetts Medical School. The author has contributed to research in topics: Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale & Public health. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 29 publications receiving 5068 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.
Christopher G. Goetz,Barbara C. Tilley,Stephanie R. Shaftman,Glenn T. Stebbins,Stanley Fahn,Pablo Martinez-Martin,Werner Poewe,Cristina Sampaio,Matthew B. Stern,Richard Dodel,Bruno Dubois,Robert G. Holloway,Joseph Jankovic,Jaime Kulisevsky,Anthony E. Lang,Andrew J. Lees,Sue Leurgans,Peter A. LeWitt,David L. Nyenhuis,C. Warren Olanow,Olivier Rascol,Anette Schrag,Jeanne A. Teresi,Jacobus J. van Hilten,Nancy R. LaPelle,Pinky Agarwal,Saima Athar,Yvette Bordelan,Helen Bronte-Stewart,Richard Camicioli,Kelvin L. Chou,Wendy Cole,Arif Dalvi,Holly Delgado,Alan Diamond,Jeremy P.R. Dick,John E. Duda,Rodger J. Elble,Carol Evans,V. G. H. Evidente,Hubert H. Fernandez,Susan H. Fox,Joseph H. Friedman,Robin D. Fross,David A. Gallagher,Deborah A. Hall,Neal Hermanowicz,Vanessa K. Hinson,Stacy Horn,Howard I. Hurtig,Un Jung Kang,Galit Kleiner-Fisman,Olga Klepitskaya,Katie Kompoliti,Eugene C. Lai,Maureen L. Leehey,Iracema Leroi,Kelly E. Lyons,Terry McClain,Steven W. Metzer,Janis M. Miyasaki,John C. Morgan,Martha Nance,Joanne Nemeth,Rajesh Pahwa,Sotirios A. Parashos,Jay S. Schneider,Kapil D. Sethi,Lisa M. Shulman,Andrew Siderowf,Monty Silverdale,Tanya Simuni,Mark Stacy,Robert Malcolm Stewart,Kelly L. Sullivan,David M. Swope,Pettaruse M. Wadia,Richard Walker,Ruth H. Walker,William J. Weiner,Jill Wiener,Jayne R. Wilkinson,Joanna M. Wojcieszek,Summer C. Wolfrath,Frederick Wooten,Allen Wu,Theresa A. Zesiewicz,Richard M. Zweig +87 more
TL;DR: The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS‐UPDRS for rating PD.
Journal ArticleDOI
Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan.
Christopher G. Goetz,Stanley Fahn,Pablo Martinez-Martin,Werner Poewe,Cristina Sampaio,Glenn T. Stebbins,Matthew B. Stern,Barbara C. Tilley,Richard Dodel,Bruno Dubois,Robert G. Holloway,Joseph Jankovic,Jaime Kulisevsky,Anthony E. Lang,Andrew J. Lees,Sue Leurgans,Peter A. LeWitt,David L. Nyenhuis,C. Warren Olanow,Olivier Rascol,Anette Schrag,Jeanne A. Teresi,Jacobus J. van Hilten,Nancy R. LaPelle +23 more
TL;DR: The MDS‐UPDRS retains the UPDRS structure of four parts with a total summed score, but the parts have been modified to provide a section that integrates nonmotor elements of PD: I, Nonmotor Experiences of Daily Living; II, Motor Exper experiences of daily Living; III, Motor Examination; and IV, Motor Complications.
Journal ArticleDOI
Simplifying Qualitative Data Analysis Using General Purpose Software Tools
TL;DR: The techniques outlined can be used for analyzing and managing many kinds of data, including key informant interviews, focus groups, document and literature reviews, and open-ended survey questions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study
TL;DR: A dual strategy of promoting incremental improvements in existing information delivery systems based on the expressed preferences of the PH users of the systems and the concurrent development and rigorous evaluation of new models of information organization and delivery that draw on successful resources already operating to deliver information to clinical medical practitioners are proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Sustainability of public health programs: the example of tobacco treatment services in Massachusetts.
TL;DR: 2 key strategies-redefining the scope of services being offered and creative use of resources-were factors that determined whether some community agencies were able to sustain services at a much higher level than others after funding was discontinued.