scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Beaumont Health

NonprofitRoyal Oak, Michigan, United States
About: Beaumont Health is a nonprofit organization based out in Royal Oak, Michigan, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Medicine & Population. The organization has 1483 authors who have published 1448 publications receiving 15407 citations. The organization is also known as: William Beaumont Health System & Beaumont Hospitals.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Joel Hein1, Jordan Reilly1, Jonathan Chae1, Tristan Maerz1, Kyle Anderson1 
TL;DR: Both DR and SB have lower retear rates than SR in most tear size categories, and neither DR nor SB did not differ significantly from each other in any tear size category.
Abstract: Purpose To determine whether there are differences in retear rates among arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair. Methods The literature was systematically reviewed for clinical outcome studies assessing arthroscopic single-row, double-row, or suture bridge rotator cuff repair. All included studies indicated the imaging-diagnosed retear rate stratified by preoperative tear size at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up, and retears were diagnosed with either magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, or arthrogram. Only studies with comprehensive surgical methods were included, and the repair type was confirmed by the number of rows of fixation and suture configuration. Studies from journals with an impact factor below 1.5 were excluded. Retear rates were grouped and statistically compared using χ 2 tests. Results Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 2,048 repairs. Double-row repair (DR) and suture bridge repair (SB) both had significantly lower retear rates than single-row repair (SR) for tears sized 1 to 3 cm (DR, P P P P = .004), greater than 3 cm (DR, P = .016; SB, P = .003), and greater than 5 cm (DR, P = .003; SB, P = .003), as well as total retear rates (DR, P = .024; SB, P = .022). DR and SB did not differ significantly from each other in any tear size category. Conclusions Both DR and SB have lower retear rates than SR in most tear size categories. No differences in retear rates were found between DR and SB. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.

187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation with the Urgent® PC Neuromodulation System for overactive bladder after 3 years of therapy is reported.

177 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This comprehensive review discusses the current published literature surrounding the SARS-CoV-2 virus and identifies and provides insight into controversies and research gaps for the current pandemic to assist with future research ideas.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that is responsible for the 2019-2020 pandemic. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the current published literature surrounding the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We examine the fundamental concepts including the origin, virology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, laboratory, radiology, and histopathologic findings, complications, and treatment. Given that much of the information has been extrapolated from what we know about other coronaviruses including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), we identify and provide insight into controversies and research gaps for the current pandemic to assist with future research ideas. Finally, we discuss the global response to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and provide thoughts regarding lessons for future pandemics.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results of the Thoracic Auto-Segmentation Challenge showed that the lungs and heart can be segmented fairly accurately by various algorithms, while deep-learning methods performed better on the esophagus.
Abstract: Purpose This report presents the methods and results of the Thoracic Auto-Segmentation Challenge organized at the 2017 Annual Meeting of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of the challenge was to provide a benchmark dataset and platform for evaluating performance of autosegmentation methods of organs at risk (OARs) in thoracic CT images. Methods Sixty thoracic CT scans provided by three different institutions were separated into 36 training, 12 offline testing, and 12 online testing scans. Eleven participants completed the offline challenge, and seven completed the online challenge. The OARs were left and right lungs, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord. Clinical contours used for treatment planning were quality checked and edited to adhere to the RTOG 1106 contouring guidelines. Algorithms were evaluated using the Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance. A consolidated score was computed by normalizing the metrics against interrater variability and averaging over all patients and structures. Results The interrater study revealed highest variability in Dice for the esophagus and spinal cord, and in surface distances for lungs and heart. Five out of seven algorithms that participated in the online challenge employed deep-learning methods. Although the top three participants using deep learning produced the best segmentation for all structures, there was no significant difference in the performance among them. The fourth place participant used a multi-atlas-based approach. The highest Dice scores were produced for lungs, with averages ranging from 0.95 to 0.98, while the lowest Dice scores were produced for esophagus, with a range of 0.55-0.72. Conclusion The results of the challenge showed that the lungs and heart can be segmented fairly accurately by various algorithms, while deep-learning methods performed better on the esophagus. Our dataset together with the manual contours for all training cases continues to be available publicly as an ongoing benchmarking resource.

172 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper briefly focuses on the association of the major CD44 variant isoforms in cancer progression, the role of HA-CD44 interaction in oncogenic pathways, and strategies to target CD44-overexpressed tumor cells.
Abstract: CD44 is a cell surface HA-binding glycoprotein that is overexpressed to some extent by almost all tumors of epithelial origin and plays an important role in tumor initiation and metastasis. CD44 is a compelling marker for cancer stem cells of many solid malignancies. In addition, interaction of HA and CD44 promotes EGFR-mediated pathways, consequently leading to tumor cell growth, tumor cell migration, and chemotherapy resistance in solid cancers. Accumulating evidence indicates that major HA-CD44 signaling pathways involve a specific variant of CD44 isoforms; however, the particular variant almost certainly depends on the type of tumor cell and the stage of the cancer progression. Research to date suggests use of monoclonal antibodies against different CD44 variant isoforms and targeted inhibition of HA/CD44-mediated signaling combined with conventional radio/chemotherapy may be the most favorable therapeutic strategy for future treatments of advanced stage malignancies. Thus, this paper briefly focuses on the association of the major CD44 variant isoforms in cancer progression, the role of HA-CD44 interaction in oncogenic pathways, and strategies to target CD44-overexpressed tumor cells.

171 citations


Authors

Showing all 1494 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Barry P. Rosen10252936258
Praveen Kumar88133935718
George S. Wilson8871633034
Ahmed Ali6172815197
Di Yan6129511437
David P. Wood5924312154
Brian D. Kavanagh5832215865
James A. Goldstein4919312312
Kenneth M. Peters461976513
James M. Robbins451578489
Bin Nan441395321
Inga S. Grills432176343
Sachin Kheterpal431698545
Craig W. Stevens421646598
Thomas Guerrero41935018
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

91% related

Cleveland Clinic
79.3K papers, 3.4M citations

91% related

Rush University Medical Center
29K papers, 1.3M citations

90% related

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
26.4K papers, 1.2M citations

89% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20232
202220
2021253
2020210
2019166
2018161