Institution
Botanic Gardens Conservation International
Archive•Guangzhou, China•
About: Botanic Gardens Conservation International is a archive organization based out in Guangzhou, China. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Threatened species & Ex situ conservation. The organization has 42 authors who have published 103 publications receiving 2422 citations. The organization is also known as: BGCI.
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A strategy to collect and bank seeds of plant species at risk of extinction in the face of rapid climate change is presented to ensure that emerging habitats are as species-diverse as possible.
340 citations
••
TL;DR: An overview of all known tree species by scientific name and country level distribution is presented, for the first time, and an online database—GlobalTreeSearch—that provides access to this information is described that will be used as the basis of the Global Tree Assessment.
Abstract: This article presents, for the first time, an overview of all known tree species by scientific name and country level distribution, and describes an online database—GlobalTreeSearch—that provides access to this information. Based on our comprehensive analysis of published data sources and expert input, the number of tree species currently known to science is 60,065, representing 20% of all angiosperm and gymnosperm plant species. Nearly half of all tree species (45%) are found in just 10 families, with the 3 most tree-rich families being Leguminosae, Rubiaceae, and Myrtaceae. Geographically, Brazil, Colombia, and Indonesia are the countries with the most tree species. The countries with the most country-endemic tree species reflect broader plant diversity trends (Brazil, Australia, China) or islands where isolation has resulted in speciation (Madagascar, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia). Nearly 58% of all tree species are single-country endemics. Our intention is for GlobalTreeSearch to be used as a t...
262 citations
••
TL;DR: It is argued for a renewed focus on quantitative genetic studies to determine how, or if, species will adapt to changing conditions and additional genetic considerations and research questions must be actively studied now to effectively inform future actions.
207 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the main environmental risks of large-scale tree planting and propose 10 golden rules to implement forest ecosystem restoration that maximizes rates of both carbon sequestration and biodiversity recovery while improving livelihoods.
Abstract: Urgent solutions to global climate change are needed. Ambitious tree-planting initiatives, many already underway, aim to sequester enormous quantities of carbon to partly compensate for anthropogenic CO2 emissions, which are a major cause of rising global temperatures. However, tree planting that is poorly planned and executed could actually increase CO2 emissions and have long-term, deleterious impacts on biodiversity, landscapes and livelihoods. Here, we highlight the main environmental risks of large-scale tree planting and propose 10 golden rules, based on some of the most recent ecological research, to implement forest ecosystem restoration that maximizes rates of both carbon sequestration and biodiversity recovery while improving livelihoods. These are as follows: (1) Protect existing forest first; (2) Work together (involving all stakeholders); (3) Aim to maximize biodiversity recovery to meet multiple goals; (4) Select appropriate areas for restoration; (5) Use natural regeneration wherever possible; (6) Select species to maximize biodiversity; (7) Use resilient plant material (with appropriate genetic variability and provenance); (8) Plan ahead for infrastructure, capacity and seed supply; (9) Learn by doing (using an adaptive management approach); and (10) Make it pay (ensuring the economic sustainability of the project). We focus on the design of long-term strategies to tackle the climate and biodiversity crises and support livelihood needs. We emphasize the role of local communities as sources of indigenous knowledge, and the benefits they could derive from successful reforestation that restores ecosystem functioning and delivers a diverse range of forest products and services. While there is no simple and universal recipe for forest restoration, it is crucial to build upon the currently growing public and private interest in this topic, to ensure interventions provide effective, long-term carbon sinks and maximize benefits for biodiversity and people.
204 citations
••
Royal Botanic Gardens1, University of Ioannina2, University of León3, National University of Ireland, Galway4, University of Coimbra5, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh6, University of Vienna7, University of São Paulo8, University of Yaoundé I9, University of Minnesota10, University of Sydney11, Botanic Gardens Conservation International12, Royal Holloway, University of London13, Universidade Federal de Pelotas14, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul15, Federal University of Paraná16, University of Gothenburg17
192 citations
Authors
Showing all 42 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Andrea T. Kramer | 18 | 49 | 1694 |
Malin C. Rivers | 17 | 31 | 842 |
Paul Smith | 14 | 25 | 1006 |
Suzanne Sharrock | 12 | 25 | 368 |
Peter Wyse Jackson | 10 | 25 | 428 |
Murphy Westwood | 8 | 14 | 295 |
Joachim Gratzfeld | 8 | 11 | 214 |
Sara Oldfield | 7 | 12 | 246 |
Shannon M. Still | 7 | 9 | 273 |
Abby Meyer | 7 | 11 | 143 |
Xiangying Wen | 5 | 9 | 145 |
Kate Davis | 5 | 11 | 62 |
Meirion Jones | 5 | 5 | 120 |
Katherine O'Donnell | 3 | 4 | 62 |
Kirsty Shaw | 3 | 4 | 69 |