scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

European Business School London

About: European Business School London is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Real estate investment trust & Empirical research. The organization has 323 authors who have published 636 publications receiving 17446 citations. The organization is also known as: EBS London.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors empirically investigate correlation structures and cointegration relationships of private and public real estate and equity markets for the United States and the United Kingdom and find that public real-estate stocks show similarities to the general stock market with regard to short-term return co-movements.
Abstract: This paper addresses the question of whether shares of public real estate companies should be treated as real estate or as equity investments Because theoretical considerations do not suffice for making such a classification, we empirically investigate correlation structures and cointegration relationships of private and public real estate and equity markets for the United States and the United Kingdom Our results suggest that public real estate stocks show similarities to the general stock market with regard to short-term return co-movements For long-term investment horizons, the interdependence between direct and securitized real estate is much stronger However, in the latter case, real estate stocks substantially lead the private property markets

68 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors derive explanations for the application of different control mechanisms in the global sourcing context by elaborating on the information processing perspective of contingency theory, and formulate ten propositions for future research.

67 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the transfer of general real options theory through an examination of academic results in the field of real estate development and came to the conclusion that current research generates highly academic-abstract results with limited practical value.
Abstract: The interpretation and valuation of real options by means of options pricing theory can be regarded as a relatively new paradigm of investment theory. Option pricing theory based investment valuation represents a sound theoretical basis and offers principally a simple decision base. The approach recognises entrepreneurial flexibility and risk explicitly. It implies a positive correlation between flexibility respectively uncertainty and the value of options. Traditional deterministic‐dynamic standard methods of valuation are not able to value flexibility or risk effectively so that option values are adequately reflected. As property investors gradually embrace modern financial concepts it is clear that real estate valuation theory will have to change. One of the most promising areas that could have an important implication on the further development of valuation is the application of the real options paradigm. The author investigates the transfer of general real options theory through an examination of academic results in the field of real estate development. He comes to the conclusion that current research generates highly academic‐abstract results with limited practical value. So far a limited number of quantitative studies regarding the valuation real estate projects with the real options method have been conducted. Practical valuations have yet to be comprehensively carried out. For doing so, further research concerning the basic prerequisites of real options theory has to be undertaken.

66 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the approaches to investee valuation and sources of information used by venture capital investors in English, French and German legal systems as well as geographical regions, and found that VC firms in Europe and Asia are significantly less likely than US VC firms to make use of liquidation value methods but significantly more likely to use PE comparators.
Abstract: This paper uses a large multi-country sample of venture capital firms to compare the approaches to investee valuation and sources of information used by venture capital investors in English, French and German legal systems as well as geographical regions. Different legal systems are significantly associated with the valuation mechanism used. In particular, compared to English-based Common Law systems, VC firms operating in a Germanic legal system are significantly more likely to use DCF based measures and significantly less likely to use PE comparators. This latter result is also the case for VC firms operating in a French legal system who are also significantly more likely to adopt historic cost valuation methods. VC firms in Europe and Asia are significantly less likely than US VC firms to make use of liquidation value methods but significantly more likely to use PE comparators. European firms are significantly less likely to adopt DCF methods compared to US VC firms. VC firms operating under a Germanic legal system are less likely to utilise information from the financial press but significantly more likely to use interviews with entrepreneurs. VC firms operating under a French legal system are more likely to utilise interviews with company personnel as well as sales and marketing information. VC firms in Europe and Asia are significantly more likely than US VC firms to use financial press. VC firms in Asia are significantly less likely to make use of interviews with entrepreneurs or business plan data. VC firms in Europe are significantly more likely to utilise sales and marketing information.

66 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a holistic performance measurement system (PMS) for ramp services, which is based on a process-based perspective and reflects the supply chain of airport logistics.

65 citations


Authors

Showing all 323 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Bernard Cova5121810641
Holger Patzelt421419893
Reint Gropp381306525
Evi Hartmann351005376
Constantin Blome35825849
Andreas Rasche301274273
Günter Schmidt291193688
John L. Glascock28882638
David C. Lane27823045
Ben R. Craig261323186
Dirk Schiereck254013311
Stefan Smolnik251292080
Utz Schäffer251902316
Michael M. Bechtel25752126
Nils Urbach251803614
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Vienna University of Economics and Business
6.6K papers, 176.4K citations

84% related

Copenhagen Business School
9.6K papers, 341.8K citations

84% related

Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

83% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

81% related

INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202120
202014
201912
201821
201717
201612