Institution
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Other•St Louis, Missouri, United States•
About: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis is a other organization based out in St Louis, Missouri, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Monetary policy & Inflation. The organization has 203 authors who have published 1650 publications receiving 46084 citations.
Topics: Monetary policy, Inflation, Interest rate, Business cycle, Debt
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The Federal Reserve's unconventional monetary policy announcements in 2008-2009 substantially reduced international long-term bond yields and the spot value of the dollar as mentioned in this paper, and the jump depreciations of the USD are fairly consistent with estimates of the impacts of previous equivalent monetary policy shocks.
Abstract: The Federal Reserve’s unconventional monetary policy announcements in 2008–2009 substantially reduced international long-term bond yields and the spot value of the dollar. These changes closely followed announcements and were very unlikely to have occurred by chance. A simple portfolio choice model can produce quantitatively plausible changes in U.S. and foreign excess bond yields. The jump depreciations of the USD are fairly consistent with estimates of the impacts of previous equivalent monetary policy shocks. The policy announcements do not appear to have reduced yields by reducing expectations of real growth. Unconventional policy can reduce international long-term yields and the value of the dollar even at the zero bound.
258 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors empirically investigated the implications of this sort of labor participation in corporate decision making, and found that companies with equal representation of employees and shareholders on the supervisory board trade at a 31% stock market discount as compared with companies where employee representatives fill only one-third of the board seats.
Abstract: Under the German corporate governance system of codetermination, employees are legally allocated control rights over corporate assets through seats on the supervisory board—that is, the board of nonexecutive directors. The supervisory board oversees the management board—the board of executive directors—approves or rejects its decisions, and appoints its members and sets their salaries. We empirically investigate the implications of this sort of labor participation in corporate decision making. We find that companies with equal representation of employees and shareholders on the supervisory board trade at a 31% stock market discount as compared with companies where employee representatives fill only one-third of the supervisory board seats. We show that under equal representation, management board compensation provides incentives that are not conducive to furthering shareholders' interests, possibly because labor maximizes a different objective function than shareholders. We document that, under equal representation, companies have longer payrolls than their one-third representation peers have. Finally, we provide evidence that shareholders respond to the allocation of control rights to labor by linking supervisory board compensation to firm performance and by leveraging up the firm. (JEL: G32, G34)
248 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare various spatial econometric models and estimation methods in a hedonic price framework to examine the impact of noise on 2003 housing values near the Atlanta airport.
Abstract: Despite the refrain that housing prices are determined by "location, location, and location," no prior studies of airport noise and housing prices have incorporated spatial econometric techniques. We compare various spatial econometric models and estimation methods in a hedonic price framework to examine the impact of noise on 2003 housing values near the Atlanta airport. Spatial effects are best captured by a model including both spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive parameters estimated by a generalized moments approach. The inclusion of spatial effects magnifies the negative price impacts of airport noise. Finally, after controlling for noise, houses farther from the airport tend to sell for less, implying that airport proximity is an amenity.
236 citations
••
TL;DR: For example, this article showed that the US economy has seen neither a dramatic acceleration in the rate of technological progress nor a major increase in the levels of research and development expenditure, unless productivity is identifi ed with the number of patents awarded.
Abstract: evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity, unless productivity is identifi ed with the number of patents awarded—which, as productivity is identifi ed with the number of patents awarded—which, as evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity. This disconnect is evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity. This disconnect is at the root of what is called the “patent puzzle”: in spite of the enormous increase in at the root of what is called the “patent puzzle”: in spite of the enormous increase in the number of patents and in the strength of their legal protection, the US economy the number of patents and in the strength of their legal protection, the US economy has seen neither a dramatic acceleration in the rate of technological progress nor a has seen neither a dramatic acceleration in the rate of technological progress nor a major increase in the levels of research and development expenditure. major increase in the levels of research and development expenditure. Both theory and evidence suggest that while patents can have a partial equiBoth theory and evidence suggest that while patents can have a partial equilibrium effect of improving incentives to invent, the general equilibrium effect on librium effect of improving incentives to invent, the general equilibrium effect on innovation can be negative. The historical and international evidence suggests that innovation can be negative. The historical and international evidence suggests that while weak patent systems may mildly increase innovation with limited side effects, while weak patent systems may mildly increase innovation with limited side effects, strong patent systems retard innovation with many negative side effects. More generstrong patent systems retard innovation with many negative side effects. More generally, the initial eruption of innovations leading to the creation of a new industry—from ally, the initial eruption of innovations leading to the creation of a new industry—from chemicals to cars, from radio and television to personal computers and investment chemicals to cars, from radio and television to personal computers and investment banking—is seldom, if ever, born out of patent protection and is instead the fruit of a banking—is seldom, if ever, born out of patent protection and is instead the fruit of a competitive environment. It is only after the initial stage of rampant growth ends that competitive environment. It is only after the initial stage of rampant growth ends that mature industries turn toward the legal protection of patents, usually because their mature industries turn toward the legal protection of patents, usually because their internal growth potential diminishes and they become more concentrated. These internal growth potential diminishes and they become more concentrated. These observations, supported by a steadily increasing body of evidence, are consistent with observations, supported by a steadily increasing body of evidence, are consistent with
228 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors modeled the interaction between asymmetrically informed principals, and showed that better information ex ante and stronger legal protection ex post facilitate the entry of low-cost outside competitors into credit markets.
223 citations
Authors
Showing all 214 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
William Easterly | 93 | 253 | 49657 |
David K. Levine | 66 | 358 | 22455 |
Lucio Sarno | 65 | 218 | 17418 |
Paul W. Wilson | 53 | 147 | 18562 |
Christopher J. Neely | 47 | 201 | 8438 |
Edward Nelson | 46 | 143 | 7819 |
David C. Wheelock | 40 | 173 | 6125 |
Michele Boldrin | 40 | 154 | 8365 |
Massimo Guidolin | 36 | 230 | 5640 |
Daniel L. Thornton | 36 | 230 | 5064 |
Jeremy M. Piger | 34 | 98 | 5997 |
Howard J. Wall | 34 | 136 | 4488 |
Michael T. Owyang | 34 | 204 | 3890 |
Christopher Otrok | 34 | 98 | 7601 |
Ping Wang | 33 | 241 | 4263 |