Institution
German Red Cross
Healthcare•Berlin, Germany•
About: German Red Cross is a healthcare organization based out in Berlin, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Transplantation & Mesenchymal stem cell. The organization has 653 authors who have published 1146 publications receiving 40111 citations. The organization is also known as: Deutsches Rotes Kreuz & DRK.
Topics: Transplantation, Mesenchymal stem cell, Population, Stem cell, Antigen
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Findings suggest that ASC resist HG-stress whereas endothelial cell angiogenic capacity is reduced, suggesting that ASC may be potentially therapeutically active in DR by restoringAngiogenic deficits in retinal endothelial cells by the secretion of proangiogenic factors.
14 citations
••
University of British Columbia1, Vancouver Coastal Health2, Haukeland University Hospital3, University of Cambridge4, National Health Service5, Australian Red Cross Blood Service6, German Red Cross7, New York Blood Center8, Karolinska University Hospital9, McMaster University10, University of Alberta11, Canadian Blood Services12
TL;DR: Information was collected from blood manufacturers worldwide regarding details of WB collection and processing used to produce RCCs and quality parameters and testing as part of routine quality programmes.
Abstract: Introduction In vitro qualitative differences exist in red cell concentrates (RCCs) units processed from whole blood (WB) depending on the method of processing. Minimal literature exists on differences in processing and variability in quality data. Therefore, we collected information from blood manufacturers worldwide regarding (1) details of WB collection and processing used to produce RCCs and (2) quality parameters and testing as part of routine quality programmes. Methods A secure web-based survey was developed, refined after pilot data collection and distributed to blood centres. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results Data from ten blood centres in nine countries were collected. Six blood centres (60%) processed RCCs using the top-and-top (TAT) method which produces RCCs and plasma, and eight centres (80%) used the bottom-and-top (BAT) which additionally produces buffy coat platelets. Five of the centres used both processing methods; however, four favoured BAT processing. One centre utilized the Reveos automated system exclusively. All centres performed pre-storage leucoreduction. Other parameters demonstrated variability, including active cooling at collection, length of hold before processing, donor haemoglobin limits, acceptable collection weights, collection sets, time to leucoreduction, centrifugation speeds, extraction devices and maximum RCC shelf life. Quality marker testing also differed amongst blood centres. Trends towards higher RCC unit volume, haemolysis and residual leucoctyes were seen in the TAT compared with BAT processing across centres. Conclusion Methods and parameters of WB processing and quality testing of RCCs differ amongst surveyed blood manufacturers. Further studies are needed to assess variations and to potentially improve methods and product quality.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: Compared to the group without training and the group with an alternative training (spelling training group), the children of the Calcularis group demonstrated a higher benefit in subtraction and number line estimation with medium to large effect sizes.
Abstract: Calcularis is a computer-based training program which focuses on basic numerical skills, spatial representation of numbers and arithmetic operations. The program includes a user model allowing flexible adaptation to the child’s individual knowledge and learning profile. The study design to evaluate the training comprises three conditions (Calcularis group, waiting control group, spelling training group). One hundred and thirty-eight children from second to fifth grade participated in the study. Training duration comprised a minimum of 24 training sessions of 20 minutes within a time period of 6 to 8 weeks. Compared to the group without training (waiting control group) and the group with an alternative training (spelling training group), the children of the Calcularis group demonstrated a higher benefit in subtraction and number line estimation with medium to large effect sizes. Therefore, Calcularis can be used effectively to support children in arithmetic performance and spatial number representation.
14 citations
••
University of Cambridge1, Canadian Blood Services2, Héma-Québec3, New Zealand Blood Service4, Australian Red Cross Blood Service5, Swiss Red Cross6, University of São Paulo7, Finnish Red Cross8, Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center9, Mayo Clinic10, National Institutes of Health11, Carter BloodCare12, German Red Cross13, American Red Cross14, Health Sciences Authority15
TL;DR: This work aimed to identify Hb measurement practices across blood donation services and to what extent differences associate with low‐Hb deferral rates.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: A prospective study is initiated to assess whether there is an increased risk of donor reactions in elderly donors, and if so, how this might affect blood supply.
Abstract: Background Due to the ageing population, blood donation by the elderly is necessary to maintain blood supply. We initiated a prospective study, to assess whether there is an increased risk of donor reactions in elderly donors.
Study Design and Methods In this prospective study, regular donors aged from 66 to 68 and 69 to 71 years were invited to continue blood donation on mobile collection sites of the German Red Cross Blood Service West. A control group (50–52 years) was established. Admission of donors in all groups followed the German national guidelines for blood donation. Donor deferrals and all kinds of donor reactions during donation (on-site) and in the 48 h following donation (off-site) were monitored.
Results A total of 64 260 valid cases were entered in the study. Donor deferrals increased with age from 1·12% in the control group up to 8·74 in female donors aged 69–71 years. Adverse reactions to blood donation were rare with an overall reaction rate of 0·63% (0·05% on-site; 0·58% off-site). Off-site reactions significantly decreased with increasing age. The relative risk (RR) for adverse reactions in elderly donors compared to the control group (50–52 years) was slightly increased for on-site reactions in the 69- to 71-year-old donors (RR 1·0309; 95% CI 1·0292–1·0325). In all other comparisons, the RR for adverse reactions was distinctively lower in elderly donors (RR 0·3785 – 0·7778).
Conclusions Our data confirm that elderly regular blood donors may safely continue blood donation at least to the age of 71. Based on these data, we increased the upper age limit.
14 citations
Authors
Showing all 658 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Johannes Oldenburg | 72 | 583 | 18790 |
Bodo Niggemann | 71 | 279 | 19475 |
Norbert Weissmann | 71 | 384 | 21187 |
Hubert Schrezenmeier | 69 | 360 | 16215 |
Triantafyllos Chavakis | 65 | 242 | 13247 |
Klaus Schwarz | 58 | 209 | 13407 |
Willy A. Flegel | 50 | 233 | 6742 |
Rainer M. Bohle | 49 | 235 | 6923 |
Torsten Tonn | 48 | 151 | 11328 |
Daniel Ricklin | 46 | 144 | 10713 |
Erhard Seifried | 44 | 254 | 7967 |
Pamela S. Becker | 42 | 257 | 6256 |
Karen Bieback | 41 | 135 | 10010 |
Halvard Bonig | 41 | 216 | 4828 |
Julia Kzhyshkowska | 40 | 126 | 5963 |