scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

London Business School

EducationLondon, England, United Kingdom
About: London Business School is a education organization based out in London, England, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Portfolio & Equity (finance). The organization has 1138 authors who have published 5118 publications receiving 437980 citations. The organization is also known as: LBS.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors apply a general Box-Cox transformation within the context of hedonic models which exploit all the variables (objective and sensorial characteristics, reputation) pointed out by previous literature as relevant in driving market prices.
Abstract: The aim of this article is to provide new evidence on the factors affecting wine prices on both methodological and factual grounds. On the methodological ground, this study is the first to apply a general Box–Cox transformation within the context of hedonic models which exploit all the variables (objective and sensorial characteristics, reputation) pointed out by previous literature as relevant in driving market prices. On the factual ground, the article fills the lack of empirical evidence on the issue for Italy, one of the leading wine producers, by using a large data set on two premium quality wines (Barolo and Barbaresco) covering the 1995–1998 vintages. Our results support the evidence obtained using data from other countries, showing that sensorial traits, the reputation of wines and producers, as well as objective variables are all important factors influencing the consumers' willingness to pay. More importantly, by resorting to a nonnested statistical test (Vuong, 1989) we compare two alternative ...

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a study was conducted to assess the impact of interpersonal skills training on top managers and found significant impact on some, but not all, of the competencies and skills under study.
Abstract: Some organizations invest a great deal of time and effort in elaborate training programmes designed to improve the so‐called “soft” skills of managing. Yet assessing the effectiveness of such initiatives has been rare. Indeed, some trainers have argued that such assessments are misleading. Recent developments in the use of survey feedback have provided a technique for pre‐ and post‐training assessments. A study, at a leading business school, was designed to assess the impact of interpersonal skills training on top managers. The evaluation of the training was based on subordinate feedback of 252 executives from 48 organizations, conducted before, and six months after, the training programme took place. The results indicate significant impact on some, but not all, of the competencies and skills under study.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Distinguishing between the three design decisions is more suitable for describing today's practices than traditional front office – back office thinking.
Abstract: Purpose – The aim of this paper is to investigate how the distinction between contact and non‐contact activities influences the design of service delivery systems and to identify key design decisions for structuring front office and back office work.Design/methodology/approach – Building on current literature, the paper identifies three design decisions and associated performance trade‐offs. The design decisions regard the degree of customer contact in the process, the decoupling of activities and the grouping of employees. The design decisions and the trade‐offs are empirically validated in five case studies of 15 service delivery systems in the financial services sector.Findings – Distinguishing between the three design decisions is more suitable for describing today's practices than traditional front office – back office thinking. For each design decision a trade‐off was observed consisting of several design considerations. However, the trade‐offs do not involve the weighing of one set of performance o...

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors analyzes corporate bond valuation and optimal call and default rules when interest rates and firm value are stochastic and uses the results to explain the dynamics of hedging, and finds that the endogenous model explains the empirical patterns better than do typical exogenous models.
Abstract: This paper analyzes corporate bond valuation and optimal call and default rules when interest rates and firm value are stochastic. It then uses the results to explain the dynamics of hedging. Bankruptcy rules are important determinants of corporate bond sensitivity to interest rates and firm value. Although endogenous and exogenous bankruptcy models can be calibrated to produce the same prices, they can have very different hedging implications. We show that empirical results on the relation between corporate spreads and Treasury rates provide evidence on duration, and we find that the endogenous model explains the empirical patterns better than do typical exogenous models. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

115 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
07 Apr 2015-PLOS ONE
TL;DR: A meta-analysis of existing work to estimate whether and how men’s facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression indicates a small, but significant, positive relationship between men's fWHR and aggression.
Abstract: Recent research has identified men’s facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) as a reliable predictor of aggressive tendencies and behavior. Other research, however, has failed to replicate the fWHR-aggression relationship and has questioned whether previous findings are robust. In the current paper, we synthesize existing work by conducting a meta-analysis to estimate whether and how fWHR predicts aggression. Our results indicate a small, but significant, positive relationship between men’s fWHR and aggression.

115 citations


Authors

Showing all 1156 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Stephen J. Wood10570039797
Viral V. Acharya9937631776
Michael Frese9738437375
James Taylor95116139945
E. Tory Higgins9436348833
Howard Thomas8350426945
John Roberts7836545997
Dinesh Bhugra7068218690
Jiju Antony6841117290
David De Cremer6529713788
Andy Neely6522226624
Gerard George6414527363
Julian Birkinshaw6423329262
Geoffrey C. Williams6423119261
Alan Manning6324517975
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

94% related

Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

89% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

87% related

Federal Reserve System
10.3K papers, 511.9K citations

87% related

Copenhagen Business School
9.6K papers, 341.8K citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20237
202250
2021179
2020165
2019166
2018145