scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Melbourne Business School

About: Melbourne Business School is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Bayesian probability & Copula (probability theory). The organization has 155 authors who have published 764 publications receiving 37402 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors outline the case for rethinking marketing planning models, and develop a conceptual framework through which the impact of environmental context on marketing planning processes can be effectively examined.
Abstract: The traditional model of marketing planning assumes that the process by which organizations take planning decisions is constant with respect to context. Organizational environment, internal context, performance and distinctive competency affect marketing planning only as information inputs for the planning process, not as influences on the choice of process. However, rapid change in environments, in competitive patterns and in market responses all demand action from organizations. Intuitively, we expect that rapid environmental change will require a faster planning process, and that increasing environmental complexity requires more careful deliberation. The marketing planning model does not accommodate such intuition. This paper outlines the case for rethinking marketing planning models, and develops a conceptual framework through which the impact of environmental context on marketing planning processes can be effectively examined.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a copula model is used to allow for asymmetry in the density forecasts of macroeconomic variables. But the model is not suitable for multivariate time series.
Abstract: There is a growing interest in allowing for asymmetry in the density forecasts of macroeconomic variables. In multivariate time series, this can be achieved with a copula model, where both serial a...

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined how CEO equity wealth at risk of loss in the form of restricted stock influences the response of multinational corporations (MNCs) to political risk and political uncertainty, and found that while greater CEO stock wealth at the risk of losing in form of a restricted stock strengthened the relationship between political uncertainty and MNCs' choice of greenfield investments over full acquisition, it did not influence the relationship of political uncertainty.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the negotiation process is an adaptive one, in which the actions taken by negotiators play a critical role, and they develop a model of negotiation that explicitly considers the relationships between context, action and outcomes.
Abstract: Negotiation is a process through which two or more parties who disagree or are in conflict seek to reach agreement. In this article, we argue that the process of resolving such conflicts is an adaptive one, in which the actions taken by negotiators play a critical role. To fully understand how negotiators obtain mutually beneficial solutions, it is necessary to understand not only the context in which negotiations occur but also how negotiators' strategic choices shape the negotiating context. We analyze the reciprocal relationships between the negotiation context, negotiators' strategic decisions and their outcomes. To do this, we differentiate two levels of action, local and global, that negotiators can take. The two levels of action describe immediate and longer-term strategic behaviours that can either sustain or transform the negotiating context. We examine how congruence between these levels of action is shaped by context (negotiators' goals) and how it in turn shapes outcomes. Building off negotiation and communication theory, we develop a model of negotiation that explicitly considers the relationships between context, action and outcomes. Drawing on negotiation research, we develop a set of propositions about these relationships and discuss their theoretical and practical implications.

10 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the existing macroeconomic and financial market conditions influence market participants' frame of reference, which in turn affects whether they interpret aggregate earnings surprises to be informative about the expected inflation component of the discount rate, the market risk premium component of discount rate or aggregate future cash flows.
Abstract: Prior research documents a negative aggregate earnings-returns relation. In contrast, we posit that the sign of the relation varies, depending upon the macroeconomic and financial market conditions that exist in the earnings announcement quarter. We argue that the existing macroeconomic and financial market conditions influence market participants’ frame of reference, which in turn affects whether they interpret aggregate earnings surprises to be informative about the expected inflation component of the discount rate, the market risk premium component of the discount rate, or aggregate future cash flows. Consistent with this, we find that the sign of the aggregate earnings-returns relation changes numerous times across our sample period. We also find that market participants interpret aggregate earnings to be informative about changes in expected inflation (market risk premium) when the sign of the aggregate earnings-returns relation is negative (positive). Finally, we identify macroeconomic and financial market conditions under which the aggregate earnings-returns relation is more (less) likely to be negative (positive).

10 citations


Authors

Showing all 155 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Joshua S. Gans5334810173
Karen A. Jehn4918522417
Lester W. Johnson4120811385
Ian Williamson413336995
Peter J. Danaher41925966
Robert E. Wood3910311476
Leon Mann398810603
Lawrence S. Welch38867689
Danny Samson371699075
Mile Terziovski34917454
Julie L. Ozanne337925790
Denice E. Welch33594733
Chris Lloyd302273815
John Alford30624533
Zeger Degraeve29723485
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

87% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

87% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

86% related

Federal Reserve System
10.3K papers, 511.9K citations

86% related

Institute for the Study of Labor
13.4K papers, 439.3K citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
202125
202020
201928
201833
201736