scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Greenwich

EducationLondon, United Kingdom
About: University of Greenwich is a education organization based out in London, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 3749 authors who have published 9958 publications receiving 234340 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A first-order theory of time is proposed as an underlying framework for most of the representative temporal models in artificial intelligence and is shown to be powerful enough to subsume the interval based theories of Allen and Hayes, the point based theory of Bruce, of McDermott, and the interval and pointbased theories of Vilain and Knight and Ma.
Abstract: In this paper, a first-order theory of time is proposed as an underlying framework for most of the representative temporal models in artificial intelligence. The theory treats both points and intervals as primitive on an equal footing, and is shown to be powerful enough to subsume the interval based theories of Allen and Hayes, the point based theories of Bruce, of McDermott, and the interval and point based theories of Vilain and Knight and Ma. The approach is different from that of Ladkin, of Van Beck, of Dechter, Meiri and Pearl, and of Maiocchi, which is either to construct intervals out of points, or to treat points and intervals separately. Formal definitions are presented to characterize the open and closed nature of primitive intervals

81 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To increase the understanding of the epidemiology of tomato leaf curl disease (ToLCD) and the key B. tabaci genetic groups involved in virus spread, the indigenous Asia I and the exotic biotype-B population from South India were used to carry out transmission experiments using Tomato leaf curl Bangalore virus.

80 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Outputs from Marxan and Zonation are compared and it is shown that the two software packages identified similar sets of priority areas, although the relatively wide distribution of habitat types and species considered offered much flexibility, suggesting that the choice of cost metric has a greater influence on conservation-planning analyses than the choices of software.
Abstract: The systematic conservation approach is now commonly used for the design of efficient marine protected area (MPA) networks, and identifying these priority areas often involves using specific conservation-planning software. Several such software programmes have been developed in recent years, each differing in the underlying algorithms used. Here, an investigation is made into whether the choice of software influences the location of priority areas by comparing outputs from Marxan and Zonation, two widely used conservation-planning, decision-support tools. Using biological and socio-economic data from the eastern English Channel, outputs are compared and it is shown that the two software packages identified similar sets of priority areas, although the relatively wide distribution of habitat types and species considered offered much flexibility. Moreover, the similarity increased with increasing spatial constraint, especially when using real-world cost data, suggesting that the choice of cost metric has a greater influence on conservation-planning analyses than the choice of software. However, Marxan generally produced more efficient results and Zonation produced results with greater connectivity, so the most appropriate software package will depend on the overall goals of the MPA planning process.

80 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2018-Energy
TL;DR: Based on wind speed and direction records from wind measurement towers at six onshore sites with different geographical climate conditions in China, statistical assessment of wind characteristics and wind energy potential at height of 70m corresponding to the hub heights of multi-megawatt wind turbines is presented and discussed in this article.

80 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper investigated interrelationships among trait authenticity, context-specific authenticity, and well-being in three samples drawn from England, the United States, and Russia, and found that English and American samples showed higher mean authenticity levels than the Russian sample.
Abstract: The study investigated interrelationships among trait authenticity, context-specific authenticity, and well-being in three samples drawn from England, the United States, and Russia. Six hundred and twenty-eight adults participated: 196 from the United States, 240 from England, and 192 from Russia. The overall sample consisted of 151 men and 477 women with a mean age of 27 years (range = 18 to 56). Authenticity was rated both as a general trait and specific to four contexts: with partner, parents, friends, and work colleagues. Well-being was measured using a measure of positive mental health. English and American samples showed higher mean authenticity levels than the Russian sample. In all three subsamples, within-subjects differences in the context-specific ratings were in the same ordinal series; authenticity was rated highest with partner, followed by friends and parents, and lowest with work colleagues. Context and country showed an interaction in their effect on authenticity; United States and Englan...

80 citations


Authors

Showing all 3822 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Rolf Loeber12847058477
Robert West112106153904
John C. Mitchell10467636467
Jian Chen96171852917
Xiaojun Wu91108831687
Lucilla Poston9156532452
Frank J. Kelly8544030005
Brendon Stubbs8175428180
Zongjin Li8063022103
Paul T. Seed7947221311
Suzanne G. Leveille7423419514
Ruth Duncan7322124991
Paul McCrone6845316632
Jonathan Hadgraft6634915661
Marc De Hert6535417566
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Nottingham
119.6K papers, 4.2M citations

90% related

University of Sheffield
102.9K papers, 3.9M citations

90% related

University of Warwick
77.1K papers, 2.6M citations

89% related

University of Bristol
113.1K papers, 4.9M citations

89% related

University of Leeds
101.8K papers, 3.6M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202335
2022206
2021808
2020682
2019655
2018615