scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing

TLDR
A logging instrument contains a pulsed neutron source and a pair of radiation detectors spaced along the length of the instrument to provide an indication of formation porosity which is substantially independent of the formation salinity.
Abstract
The Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocol is intended for use by mobile nodes in an ad hoc network. It offers quick adaptation to dynamic link conditions, low processing and memory overhead, low network utilization, and determines unicast routes to destinations within the ad hoc network. It uses destination sequence numbers to ensure loop freedom at all times (even in the face of anomalous delivery of routing control messages), avoiding problems (such as "counting to infinity") associated with classical distance vector protocols.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing

TL;DR: AOMDV as discussed by the authors is an on-demand, multipath distance vector routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks, which guarantees loop freedom and disjointness of alternate paths.
Journal ArticleDOI

Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks - A Survey

TL;DR: A survey of routing protocols for Wireless Sensor Network is given and their strengths and limitations are compared.
Journal ArticleDOI

Supporting cooperative caching in ad hoc networks

TL;DR: A hybrid approach (HybridCache) is proposed, which can further improve the performance by taking advantage of CacheData and CachePath while avoiding their weaknesses, and can significantly reduce the query delay and message complexity when compared to other caching schemes.

Modelling Data-Centric Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks

TL;DR: This paper model data-centric routing and compare its performance with tra- ditional end-to-end routing schemes for mobile ad-hoc networks, and shows that it offers significant performance gains across a wide range of opera- tional scenarios.
Journal ArticleDOI

The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the Impact of Mobility on Performance Of RouTing protocols for Adhoc NeTworks

TL;DR: This framework aims to evaluate the impact of different mobility models on the performance of MANET routing protocols, and attempts to decompose the reactive routing protocols into mechanistic ‘‘building blocks’’ to gain a deeper insight into the performance variations across protocols in the face of mobility.
References
More filters

Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels

S. Bradner
TL;DR: This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents as well as providing guidelines for authors to incorporate this phrase near the beginning of their document.

Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing for IP version 6

TL;DR: In this article, a logging instrument contains a pulsed neutron source and a pair of radiation detectors spaced along the length of the instrument to provide an indication of formation porosity which is substantially independent of the formation salinity.

Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

T. Narten, +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss issues that should be considered in formulating a policy for assigning values to a name space and provide guidelines to document authors on the specific text that must be included in documents that place demands on the IANA.

Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs

TL;DR: Many protocols make use of identifiers consisting of constants and other well-known values that must be administered by a central authority to insure that such quantities have consistent values and interpretations in different implementations.

Mobility Related Terminology

Markku Kojo, +1 more
TL;DR: This document defines terms for mobility related terminology out of work done in the Seamoby Working Group but has broader applicability for terminology used in IETF-wide discourse on technology for mobility and IP networks.