scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Cost-of-illness studies in heart failure: a systematic review 2004–2016

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
High quality data from cost-of-illness studies with a robust methodology applied can inform policy makers about the major cost drivers of heart failure and can be used as the basis of further economic evaluations.
Abstract
Heart failure is a major and growing medical and economic problem worldwide as 1–2% of the healthcare budget are spent for heart failure. The prevalence of heart failure has increased over the past decades and it is expected that there will be further raise due to the higher proportion of elderly in the western societies. In this context cost-of-illness studies can significantly contribute to a better understanding of the drivers and problems which lead to the increasing costs in heart failure. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of published cost-of-illness studies related to heart failure to highlight the increasing cost impact of heart failure. A systematic review was conducted from 2004 to 2016 to identify cost-of-illness studies related to heart failure, searching PubMed (Medline), Cochrane, Science Direct (Embase), Scopus and CRD York Database. Of the total of 16 studies identified, 11 studies reported prevalence-based estimates, 2 studies focused on incidence-based data and 3 articles presented both types of cost data. A large variation concerning cost components and estimates can be noted. Only three studies estimated indirect costs. Most of the included studies have shown that the costs for hospital admission are the most expensive cost element. Estimates for annual prevalence-based costs for heart failure patients range from $868 for South Korea to $25,532 for Germany. The lifetime costs for heart failure patients have been estimated to $126.819 per patient. Our review highlights the considerable and growing economic burden of heart failure on the health care systems. The cost-of-illness studies included in this review show large variations in methodology used and the cost results vary consequently. High quality data from cost-of-illness studies with a robust methodology applied can inform policy makers about the major cost drivers of heart failure and can be used as the basis of further economic evaluations.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Survival of patients with chronic heart failure in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

TL;DR: To provide reliable survival estimates for people with chronic heart failure and explain variation in survival by key factors, key factors including age at diagnosis, left ventricular ejection fraction, decade of diagnosis, and study setting are considered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global epidemiology and future trends of heart failure

TL;DR: HF is an emerging worldwide threat whose prevalence and health loss burden constantly increase, especially in the elderly and in people leaving in low-to middle SDI regions, and urgent preventive interventions shall be prioritized and healthcare resources redesigned around this evolving epidemiology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global burden of heart failure: A comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.

TL;DR: A contemporary overview on the global burden of HF is provided, providing updated estimates on prevalence, incidence, outcomes, and costs worldwide.
Journal ArticleDOI

OUP accepted manuscript

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors provide a contemporary overview on the global burden of heart failure, providing updated estimates on prevalence, incidence, outcomes, and costs worldwide, and provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence-based therapies for patients with heart failure.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

TL;DR: The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction increased over a 15-year period, while the rate of death from this disorder remained unchanged, and trends underscore the importance of this growing public health problem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic.

TL;DR: In the community, systolic dysfunction is frequently present in individuals without recognized CHF and diastolic dysfunction as rigorously defined by comprehensive Doppler techniques is common, often not accompanied by recognizedCHF, and associated with marked increases in all-cause mortality.
Journal ArticleDOI

ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008

TL;DR: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians and other healthcare providers in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means.
Related Papers (5)