scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Deep sequencing reveals differential expression of microRNAs in favorable versus unfavorable neuroblastoma

TLDR
In this paper, the authors analyzed the small RNA transcriptomes of five favorable and five unfavorable NBs using SOLiD next-generation sequencing, generating a total of >188 000 000 reads.
Abstract
Small non-coding RNAs, in particular microRNAs(miRNAs), regulate fine-tuning of gene expression and can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Differential miRNA expression has been reported to be of functional relevance for tumor biology. Using next-generation sequencing, the unbiased and absolute quantification of the small RNA transcriptome is now feasible. Neuroblastoma(NB) is an embryonal tumor with highly variable clinical course. We analyzed the small RNA transcriptomes of five favorable and five unfavorable NBs using SOLiD next-generation sequencing, generating a total of >188 000 000 reads. MiRNA expression profiles obtained by deep sequencing correlated well with real-time PCR data. Cluster analysis differentiated between favorable and unfavorable NBs, and the miRNA transcriptomes of these two groups were significantly different. Oncogenic miRNAs of the miR17-92 cluster and the miR-181 family were overexpressed in unfavorable NBs. In contrast, the putative tumor suppressive microRNAs, miR-542-5p and miR-628, were expressed in favorable NBs and virtually absent in unfavorable NBs. In-depth sequence analysis revealed extensive post-transcriptional miRNA editing. Of 13 identified novel miRNAs, three were further analyzed, and expression could be confirmed in a cohort of 70 NBs.

read more

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Neuroblastoma and Whole Genome Searches

Mario Capasso
TL;DR: Neuroblastoma is the most frequent solid cancer of early childhood, its incidence is 10.2 cases per million children under 15 years of age and is most frequently in the adrenal medulla and paraspinal ganglia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Current understanding of the role and regulation of miRNAs in Burkitt lymphoma.

TL;DR: The aim of this review was to summarize the current knowledge about BL and to discuss the role of miRNAs in its pathogenesis and their possible use as diagnostic and prognostic indicators.
Book ChapterDOI

MicroRNAs as Novel Targets in Liver Cancer: Facing the Clinical Challenge

TL;DR: The role of microRNAs during liver development and disease is delineated with a particular focus on the development of HCC to indicate their potential as therapeutic targets and potential conceptual and technological challenges that hamper the progress of microRNA-based treatment strategies in liver cancer.
Book ChapterDOI

SVM Based Lung Cancer Prediction Using microRNA Expression Profiling from NGS Data

TL;DR: An algorithm for microRNA expression profiling, its normalization, and a Support Vector based machine learning approach to develop a Cancer Prediction System are discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing

TL;DR: In this paper, a different approach to problems of multiple significance testing is presented, which calls for controlling the expected proportion of falsely rejected hypotheses -the false discovery rate, which is equivalent to the FWER when all hypotheses are true but is smaller otherwise.
Journal ArticleDOI

MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function

TL;DR: Although they escaped notice until relatively recently, miRNAs comprise one of the more abundant classes of gene regulatory molecules in multicellular organisms and likely influence the output of many protein-coding genes.
Journal Article

Oncomirs : microRNAs with a role in cancer

TL;DR: I MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are an abundant class of small non-protein-coding RNAs that function as negative gene regulators as discussed by the authors, and have been shown to repress the expression of important cancer-related genes and might prove useful in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
Journal ArticleDOI

A direct approach to false discovery rates

TL;DR: The calculation of the q‐value is discussed, the pFDR analogue of the p‐value, which eliminates the need to set the error rate beforehand as is traditionally done, and can yield an increase of over eight times in power compared with the Benjamini–Hochberg FDR method.
Related Papers (5)