scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A new diagnostic category of potential C difficile excretor (cytotoxigenic culture positive but cytotoxin assay negative) could be used to characterise patients with diarrhoea that is probably not due to C diffICile infection, but who can cause cross-infection.
Abstract
Summary Background Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection is controversial because of many laboratory methods, compounded by two reference methods. Cytotoxigenic culture detects toxigenic C difficile and gives a positive result more frequently (eg, because of colonisation, which means that individuals can have the bacterium but no free toxin) than does the cytotoxin assay, which detects preformed toxin in faeces. We aimed to validate the reference methods according to clinical outcomes and to derive an optimum laboratory diagnostic algorithm for C difficile infection. Methods In this prospective, multicentre study, we did cytotoxigenic culture and cytotoxin assays on 12 420 faecal samples in four UK laboratories. We also performed tests that represent the three main targets for C difficile detection: bacterium (glutamate dehydrogenase), toxins, or toxin genes. We used routine blood test results, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality to clinically validate the reference methods. Data were categorised by reference method result: group 1, cytotoxin assay positive; group 2, cytotoxigenic culture positive and cytotoxin assay negative; and group 3, both reference methods negative. Findings Clinical and reference assay data were available for 6522 inpatient episodes. On univariate analysis, mortality was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (72/435 [16·6%] vs 20/207 [9·7%], p=0·044) and in group 3 (503/5880 [8·6%], p Interpretation We noted no increase in mortality when toxigenic C difficile alone was present. Toxin (cytotoxin assay) positivity correlated with clinical outcome, and so this reference method best defines true cases of C difficile infection. A new diagnostic category of potential C difficile excretor (cytotoxigenic culture positive but cytotoxin assay negative) could be used to characterise patients with diarrhoea that is probably not due to C difficile infection, but who can cause cross-infection. Funding Department of Health and Health Protection Agency, UK.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Rapid and fully-automated detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin B via magnetic-particle-based chemiluminescent immunoassay.

TL;DR: The proposed immunoassay demonstrated high sensitivity for toxin B identification and was further optimized to achieve a linear response ranging from 0.12 to 150 ng/ mL with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.47 ng/mL, highlighting its great potential for rapid and efficient toxin B determination in human stool specimens.
Dissertation

Nutrition management of spinal cord injured patients: an investigation of resources and interventions in UK spinal cord injuries centres

TL;DR: Development of clinical nutrition practice guidelines are warranted, and further well-designed randomised controlled trails are required to confirm whether the effect of nutrition (and probiotic) intervention is cost- and clinically-effective.
Journal ArticleDOI

The future of Clostridioides difficile diagnostics.

TL;DR: A review of current and future approaches to the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile disease can be found in this article, where the focus is on improving test utilization and a quest for improved diagnostic approaches.
Posted ContentDOI

The predictive value of quantitative nucleic acid amplification detection of Clostridium difficile toxin gene for faecal sample toxin status and patient outcome

TL;DR: Low tgNAAT CT could indicate CTA positive patients, have more severe infection, increased risk of mortality and possibly recurrence, and augment a more timely diagnosis, and optimise management of these at-risk patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium

TL;DR: Single-step screening with GDH or toxin A/B tests from feces misses a significant proportion of patients compared to toxinogenic culture, putting these patients at risk from undiagnosed C. difficile infection.
References
More filters
Book

An introduction to the bootstrap

TL;DR: This article presents bootstrap methods for estimation, using simple arguments, with Minitab macros for implementing these methods, as well as some examples of how these methods could be used for estimation purposes.
Book

Applied Logistic Regression

TL;DR: Hosmer and Lemeshow as discussed by the authors provide an accessible introduction to the logistic regression model while incorporating advances of the last decade, including a variety of software packages for the analysis of data sets.
Journal ArticleDOI

Applied Logistic Regression.

TL;DR: Applied Logistic Regression, Third Edition provides an easily accessible introduction to the logistic regression model and highlights the power of this model by examining the relationship between a dichotomous outcome and a set of covariables.
Journal ArticleDOI

An introduction to ROC analysis

TL;DR: The purpose of this article is to serve as an introduction to ROC graphs and as a guide for using them in research.
Book

Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data

TL;DR: Applied Survival Analysis, Second Edition is an ideal book for graduate-level courses in biostatistics, statistics, and epidemiologic methods and serves as a valuable reference for practitioners and researchers in any health-related field or for professionals in insurance and government.
Related Papers (5)