scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The MDCT-IP had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 89, 83, 80% and 90%, respectively (global accuracy 85%). These results were closely related with those achieved by CMR-Perf: 89, 88, 85% and 91%, respectively as mentioned in this paper.
About
This article is published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology.The article was published on 2013-03-12 and is currently open access. It has received 144 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Perfusion scanning & Myocardial perfusion imaging.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: Stress myocardial perfusion imaging with MRI, computed tomography, or positron emission tomography can accurately rule out hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease and can act as a gatekeeper for invasive revascularization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Static and dynamic assessment of myocardial perfusion by computed tomography.

TL;DR: The current review provides an outline of the current status of CTP imaging and also focuses on disparities between static and dynamic CTPs for the evaluation of myocardial blood flow.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion

TL;DR: On-site CT-derived FFR combined with C CTA provides an incremental diagnostic improvement over CCTA alone in identifying haemodynamically significant stenosis defined by invasive FFR, with a diagnostic accuracy comparable with CTP.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association

TL;DR: Attempts to standardize options for all cardiac imaging modalities should be based on the sound principles that have evolved from cardiac anatomy and clinical needs, and selection of standardized methods must bebased on the following criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention

TL;DR: Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year.
Journal ArticleDOI

Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart

TL;DR: A remarkable committee was convened: The American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging came to an agreement upon all aspects of nomenclature and anatomic descriptions of the heart.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT

TL;DR: Multidetector CT angiography accurately identifies the presence and severity of obstructive coronary artery disease and subsequent revascularization in symptomatic patients, and the negative and positive predictive values indicate that multidetctor CTAngiography cannot replace conventional coronary angiographic at present.
Related Papers (5)