scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

TLDR
Treatment with tifacogin had no effect on all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and high INR and tifACogin administration was associated with an increase in risk of bleeding, irrespective of baseline INR.
Abstract
Context The expression and release of tissue factor is a major trigger for the activation of coagulation in patients with sepsis. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) forms a complex with tissue factor and blood protease factors leading to inhibition of thrombin generation and fibrin formation. Objectives To determine if administration of tifacogin (recombinant TFPI) provides mortality benefit in patients with severe sepsis and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) and to assess tifacogin safety in severe sepsis, including patients with low INR. Design and Setting A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial conducted from March 21, 2000, through September 27, 2001, in 245 hospitals in 17 countries in North America, Europe, and Israel. Patients The primary efficacy population consisted of 1754 patients (≥18 years) with severe sepsis and a high INR (≥1.2) randomly assigned to intravenous infusion of either tifacogin (0.025 mg/kg per hour for 96 hours, n = 880) or placebo (arginine citrate buffer, n = 874), and 201 patients with a low INR ( Main Outcome Measure All-cause 28-day mortality. Results Overall mortality at 28 days in the tifacogin-treated group (n = 880) vs the placebo group (n = 874) for high INR was 34.2% vs 33.9%, respectively ( P = .88, Pearson χ 2 test; P = .75, logistic regression model). None of the protocol-specified secondary end points differed between the tifacogin vs placebo groups. An analysis on the first 722 patients demonstrated a mortality rate of 38.9% for placebo vs 29.1% for tifacogin ( P = .006, Pearson χ 2 test). Tifacogin significantly attenuated prothrombin fragment 1.2 and thrombin:antithrombin complex levels ( P t test) in patients with high and low INR. Overall mortality was lower in the tifacogin response in patients with low INR (12%; n = 83) vs placebo (22.9%; n = 118) ( P =.051, Pearson χ 2 test; P = .03, logistic regression model). There was an increase in serious adverse events with bleeding in the tifacogin group in both cohorts (6.5% tifacogin and 4.8% placebo for high INR; 6.0% tifacogin and 3.3% placebo for low INR). Conclusions Treatment with tifacogin had no effect on all-cause mortality in patients with severe sepsis and high INR. Tifacogin administration was associated with an increase in risk of bleeding, irrespective of baseline INR.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Severe sepsis and septic shock

TL;DR: A review of the basis, diagnosis, and current treatment of Sepsis in patients with this disorder is examined.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hydrocortisone Therapy for Patients with Septic Shock

TL;DR: Hydrocortisone did not improve survival or reversal of shock in patients with septic shock, either overall or in patients who did not have a response to corticotropin, although hydroc Cortisone hastened reversal ofshock in patients in whom shock was reversed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012

TL;DR: In critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand with severe sepsis with and without shock, there was a decrease in mortality from 2000 to 2012, accompanied by changes in the patterns of discharge to home, rehabilitation, and other hospitals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Management of sepsis.

TL;DR: This review considers optimal management of sepsis from the point of early, goal-directed therapy, lung-protective ventilation, antibiotics, and additional therapies, such as activated protein C, as well as the use of corticosteroids, vasopressin, and intensive insulin.
Journal ArticleDOI

The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets

TL;DR: Pivotal for the clinical development of new sepsis therapies is the selection of patients on the basis of biomarkers and/or functional defects that provide specific insights into the expression or activity of the therapeutic target.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis.

TL;DR: This phase 3 trial assessed whether treatment with drotrecogin alfa activated reduced the rate of death from any cause among patients with severe sepsis.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Dose Antithrombin III in Severe Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TL;DR: High-dose antithrombin III therapy had no effect on 28-day all-cause mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock when administered within 6 hours after the onset and was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage when administered with heparin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor reduces mortality from Escherichia coli septic shock.

TL;DR: Evidence is provided for the significance of tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in bacterial sepsis, and a role for blood coagulation in the regulation of the inflammatory response is suggested.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cultured normal human hepatocytes do not synthesize lipoprotein-associated coagulation inhibitor: evidence that endothelium is the principal site of its synthesis.

TL;DR: It is concluded that normal liver does not synthesize LACI and that endothelium is the principal source of plasma LACH, or lipoprotein-associated coagulation inhibitor (LACI).
Related Papers (5)