How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis
Joanne Greenhalgh,Kate Gooding,Kate Gooding,Elizabeth Gibbons,Sonia Dalkin,Sonia Dalkin,Judy Wright,Jose M Valderas,Nick Black +8 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings show thatPROMs completion is not a neutral act of information retrieval but can change how patients think about their condition and reveal that the ways in which clinicians use PROMs is shaped by their relationships with patients and professional roles and boundaries.Abstract:
In this paper, we report the findings of a realist synthesis that aimed to understand how and in what circumstances patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support patient-clinician communication and subsequent care processes and outcomes in clinical care We tested two overarching programme theories: (1) PROMs completion prompts a process of self-reflection and supports patients to raise issues with clinicians and (2) PROMs scores raise clinicians’ awareness of patients’ problems and prompts discussion and action We examined how the structure of the PROM and care context shaped the ways in which PROMs support clinician-patient communication and subsequent care processes PROMs completion prompts patients to reflect on their health and gives them permission to raise issues with clinicians However, clinicians found standardised PROMs completion during patient assessments sometimes constrained rather than supported communication In response, clinicians adapted their use of PROMs to render them compatible with the ongoing management of patient relationships Individualised PROMs supported dialogue by enabling the patient to tell their story In oncology, PROMs completion outside of the consultation enabled clinicians to identify problematic symptoms when the PROM acted as a substitute rather than addition to the clinical encounter and when the PROM focused on symptoms and side effects, rather than health related quality of life (HRQoL) Patients did not always feel it was appropriate to discuss emotional, functional or HRQoL issues with doctors and doctors did not perceive this was within their remit This paper makes two important contributions to the literature First, our findings show that PROMs completion is not a neutral act of information retrieval but can change how patients think about their condition Second, our findings reveal that the ways in which clinicians use PROMs is shaped by their relationships with patients and professional roles and boundaries Future research should examine how PROMs completion and feedback shapes and is influenced by the process of building relationships with patients, rather than just their impact on information exchange and decision makingread more
Citations
More filters
Journal Article
The long and winding road.
TL;DR: In reality, the road to a marketed drug is often far from the frequently depicted linear path, so extracting practical insights and lessons from such experiences by discussing drug discovery 'Case histories' is the aim of an inaugural forum this month.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient‑reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings
Angela M. Stover,Lotte Haverman,Hedy A. van Oers,Joanne Greenhalgh,Caroline M. Potter,Isoqol PROMs +5 more
TL;DR: In cross-study comparisons, barriers to PROM/PREM implementation were consistent across patient populations and care settings, but enablers were context specific, suggesting the need for tailored implementation strategies based on clinic resources.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinimetric Criteria for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Danilo Carrozzino,Chiara Patierno,Jenny Guidi,Carmen Berrocal Montiel,Jianxin Cao,Mary E. Charlson,Kaj Sparle Christensen,John Concato,John Concato,Carlos De las Cuevas,Jose de Leon,Ajandek Eory,Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck,Toshi A. Furukawa,Ralph I. Horwitz,Andrew A. Nierenberg,Chiara Rafanelli,Hongxing Wang,Thomas N. Wise,Thomas N. Wise,Nicoletta Sonino,Nicoletta Sonino,Giovanni A. Fava +22 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors outline the major limitations of the psychometric model and provide criteria for clinimetric patient-reported outcome measures (CLIPROMs), with particular reference to the differences between clini-metric and psychometric approaches.
Journal Article
Functionality and feedback: a protocol for a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of PRO data to improve patient care
Joanne Greenhalgh,Sonia Dalkin,Judy Wright,Nick Black,Jose M Valderas,Elizabeth Gibbons,David Meads,L Wood,Chris Mills,Ray Pawson +9 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a realist synthesis of the evidence to understand by what means and in what circumstances the feedback of PROMs data leads to the intended service improvements.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.
Jose M Valderas,Anna Kotzeva,Mireia Espallargues,G. H. Guyatt,Carol Estwing Ferrans,Michele Y. Halyard,Dennis A. Revicki,Tara Symonds,Antoni Parada,Jordi Alonso +9 more
TL;DR: Methodological concerns limit the strength of inference regarding the impact of providing PRO information to clinicians, and results suggest great heterogeneity of impact.
Journal ArticleDOI
What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials
Grigorios Kotronoulas,Nora Kearney,Roma Maguire,Alison Harrow,David Di Domenico,Suzanne Croy,Stephen MacGillivray +6 more
TL;DR: The routine use of PROMs increases the frequency of discussion of patient outcomes during consultations, and in some studies, PRoms are associated with improved symptom control, increased supportive care measures, and patient satisfaction.
Journal ArticleDOI
The problem of appraising qualitative research
TL;DR: This work distinguishes universal features of quality from those specific to methodology and offers a set of minimally prescriptive prompts to assist with the assessment of generic features of qualitative research.
Journal ArticleDOI
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
TL;DR: Despite the existence of significant gaps in the evidence-base, there is growing evidence in support of routine PRO collection in enabling better and patient-centred care in cancer settings.