scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Knowledge and Attitudes Among Life Scientists Toward Reproducibility Within Journal Articles: A Research Survey.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors and scientists view the issues around reproducibility, focusing on interactive elements such as interactive figures embedded within online publications, as a solution for enabling the reproducible of experiments.
Abstract
We constructed a survey to understand how authors and scientists view the issues around reproducibility, focusing on interactive elements such as interactive figures embedded within online publications, as a solution for enabling the reproducibility of experiments. We report the views of 251 researchers, comprising authors who have published in eLIFE Sciences, and those who work at the Norwich Biosciences Institutes (NBI). The survey also outlines to what extent researchers are occupied with reproducing experiments themselves. Currently, there is an increasing range of tools that attempt to address the production of reproducible research by making code, data, and analyses available to the community for reuse. We wanted to collect information about attitudes around the consumer end of the spectrum, where life scientists interact with research outputs to interpret scientific results. Static plots and figures within articles are a central part of this interpretation, and therefore we asked respondents to consider various features for an interactive figure within a research article that would allow them to better understand and reproduce a published analysis. The majority (91%) of respondents reported that when authors describe their research methodology (methods and analyses) in detail, published research can become more reproducible. The respondents believe that having interactive figures in published papers is a beneficial element to themselves, the papers they read as well as to their readers. Whilst interactive figures are one potential solution for consuming the results of research more effectively to enable reproducibility, we also review the equally pressing technical and cultural demands on researchers that need to be addressed to achieve greater success in reproducibility in the life sciences.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A survey of researchers’ code sharing and code reuse practices, and assessment of interactive notebook prototypes

Lauren Cadwallader, +1 more
- 22 Aug 2022 - 
TL;DR: The average researcher, according to the results, is unwilling to incur additional costs that are currently needed to use code sharing tools alongside a publication, infer this means different models for funding and producing interactive or executable research outputs if they are to reach a large number of researchers.
Book ChapterDOI

The Reproducibility Crisis and Autism Spectrum Research

TL;DR: In the field of autism spectrum research, it has been discovered that some results published in studies may not be correct because different researchers using the same dataset and analytical methods were unable to create the same results as discussed by the authors .
Journal ArticleDOI

TIER2: enhancing Trust, Integrity and Efficiency in Research through next-level Reproducibility

TL;DR: The TIER2 project as mentioned in this paper is a new international project funded by the European Commission under their Horizon Europe programme, covering three broad research areas (social, life and computer sciences) and two stakeholder groups (research publishers and funders) to systematically investigate reproducibility across contexts.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Computing environments for reproducibility: Capturing the “Whole Tale”

TL;DR: The Whole Tale project as discussed by the authors aims to connect computational, data-intensive research efforts with the larger research process, transforming the knowledge discovery and dissemination process into one where data products are united with research articles to create "living publications" or tales.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond the Data Deluge: A Research Agenda for Large-Scale Data Sharing and Reuse

TL;DR: The purpose of this paper is to develop a research agenda for scientific data sharing and reuse that considers these three areas: broader participation in data shares and reuse, increases in the number and types of intermediaries, and more digital data products.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prepaid monetary incentive effects on mail survey response

TL;DR: In this paper, a regression model of the impact of prepaid monetary incentives on response rates in consumer and organizational mail surveys was proposed and the results support their use and show that the inducement value makes a significant impact on the effect size.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff

TL;DR: A number of significant differences exist between the attitudes and practices of clinical and basic science researchers, including their motivations for sharing, their reasons for not sharing, and the amount of work required to prepare their data.
Journal ArticleDOI

What's to know about the credibility of empirical economics?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the major parameters that are expected to affect the credibility of empirical economics: sample size, magnitude of pursued effects, number and pre-selection of tested relationships, flexibility and lack of standardization in designs, definitions, outcomes and analyses, financial and other interests and prejudices, and the multiplicity and fragmentation of efforts.
Related Papers (5)