One-Dimensional Wave Bottom Boundary Layer Model Comparison: Specific Eddy Viscosity and Turbulence Closure Models

TLDR: In this article, six one-dimensional-vertical wave bottom boundary layer models are analyzed based on different methods for estimating the turbulent eddy viscosity: Laminar, linear, parabolic, \Ik\N-one equation turbulence closure, ǫ-N-e, Ã-n-ǫ, and à -ǫ n−ǫ two equation turbulence closures.

Abstract: Six one-dimensional-vertical wave bottom boundary layer models are analyzed based on different methods for estimating the turbulent eddy viscosity: Laminar, linear, parabolic, \Ik\N—one equation turbulence closure, \Ik\N–e—two equation turbulence closure, and \Ik\N-ω—tw equation turbulence closure. Resultant velocity profiles, bed shear stresses, and turbulent kinetic energy are compared to laboratory data of oscillatory flow over smooth and rough beds. Bed shear stress estimates for the smooth bed case were most closely predicted by the \Ik\N–ω model. Normalized errors between model predictions and measurements of velocity profiles over the entire computational domain collected at 15° intervals for one-half a wave cycle show that overall the linear model was most accurate. The least accurate were the laminar and \Ik\N–e models. Normalized errors between model predictions and turbulence kinetic energy profiles showed that the \Ik\N–ω model was most accurate. Based on these findings, when the smallest overall velocity profile prediction error is required, the processing requirements and error analysis suggest that the linear eddy viscosity model is adequate. However, if accurate estimates of bed shear stress and TKE are required then, of the models tested, the \Ik\N–ω model should be used.