scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Polypharmacy among anabolic-androgenic steroid users: a descriptive metasynthesis

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The findings corroborate previous suggestions of associations between AAS use and the use of other licit and illicit substances and suggest efforts must be intensified to combat the debilitating effects of AAS-associated polypharmacy.
Abstract
As far as we are aware, no previous systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative/descriptive literature on polypharmacy in anabolic-androgenic steroid(s) (AAS) users has been published. We systematically reviewed and synthesized qualitative/descriptive literature gathered from searches in electronic databases and by inspecting reference lists of relevant literature to investigate AAS users’ polypharmacy. We adhered to the recommendations of the UK Economic and Social Research Council’s qualitative research synthesis manual and the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 50 studies published between 1985 and 2014 were included in the analysis. Studies originated from 10 countries although most originated from United States (n = 22), followed by Sweden (n = 7), England only (n = 5), and the United Kingdom (n = 4). It was evident that prior to their debut, AAS users often used other licit and illicit substances. The main ancillary/supplementary substances used were alcohol, and cannabis/cannabinoids followed by cocaine, growth hormone, and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), amphetamine/meth, clenbuterol, ephedra/ephedrine, insulin, and thyroxine. Other popular substance classes were analgesics/opioids, dietary/nutritional supplements, and diuretics. Our classification of the various substances used by AAS users resulted in 13 main groups. These non-AAS substances were used mainly to enhance the effects of AAS, combat the side effects of AAS, and for recreational or relaxation purposes, as well as sexual enhancement. Our findings corroborate previous suggestions of associations between AAS use and the use of other licit and illicit substances. Efforts must be intensified to combat the debilitating effects of AAS-associated polypharmacy.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Illicit Drug Use Among Gym-Goers: a Cross-sectional Study of Gym-Goers in Sweden

TL;DR: The results revealed a slightly higher prevalence of illicit drug use among gym attendees as compared to the general population, and may have captured an underrecognized group of young adult males who engage in weightlifting and use illicit drugs recreationally and/or as training aids.
Journal ArticleDOI

How the love of muscle can break a heart: Impact of anabolic androgenic steroids on skeletal muscle hypertrophy, metabolic and cardiovascular health

TL;DR: The aim of this review is to explore the impact of AAS use on mechanisms of muscle hypertrophy and markers of MetS and further long-term research is warranted on the effects of Aas use on metabolic health in males and females.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Anabolic Androgenic Steroid Treatment Gap: A National Study of Substance Use Disorder Treatment:

TL;DR: Given the deleterious implications to the individual and society that concomitant use of AAS may cause, it would be essential to raise the awareness about AAS use among SUD patients, and the level of competence among health professionals.
Journal ArticleDOI

The modes of administration of anabolic-androgenic steroid users (AAS): Are non-injecting people who use steroids overlooked?

TL;DR: There may be a sub-population of individuals who only use anabolic-androgenic steroids orally, suggesting NSP-based resources are unlikely to reach or be appropriate to those who do not inject AAS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preventing, producing, or reducing harm? Fitness doping risk and enabling environments

TL;DR: It is argued that formal harm reduction focused on the health and needs of those who use IPEDs offers an environment in which safer use is supported and promoted.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Journal Article

Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

TL;DR: Items such as physical exam findings, radiographic interpretations, or other diagnostic tests often rely on some degree of subjective interpretation by observers and studies that measure the agreement between two or more observers should include a statistic that takes into account the fact that observers will sometimes agree or disagree simply by chance.
Related Papers (5)