scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

PORs: Proofs of Retrievability for Large Files

Ari Juels, +1 more
- 01 Jan 2007 - 
- Vol. 2007, pp 243
TLDR
This paper defines and explores proofs of retrievability (PORs), a POR scheme that enables an archive or back-up service to produce a concise proof that a user can retrieve a target file F, that is, that the archive retains and reliably transmits file data sufficient for the user to recover F in its entirety.
Abstract
In this paper, we define and explore proofs of retrievability (PORs). A POR scheme enables an archive or back-up service (prover) to produce a concise proof that a user (verifier) can retrieve a target file F, that is, that the archive retains and reliably transmits file data sufficient for the user to recover F in its entirety.A POR may be viewed as a kind of cryptographic proof of knowledge (POK), but one specially designed to handle a large file (or bitstring) F. We explore POR protocols here in which the communication costs, number of memory accesses for the prover, and storage requirements of the user (verifier) are small parameters essentially independent of the length of F. In addition to proposing new, practical POR constructions, we explore implementation considerations and optimizations that bear on previously explored, related schemes.In a POR, unlike a POK, neither the prover nor the verifier need actually have knowledge of F. PORs give rise to a new and unusual security definition whose formulation is another contribution of our work.We view PORs as an important tool for semi-trusted online archives. Existing cryptographic techniques help users ensure the privacy and integrity of files they retrieve. It is also natural, however, for users to want to verify that archives do not delete or modify files prior to retrieval. The goal of a POR is to accomplish these checks without users having to download the files themselves. A POR can also provide quality-of-service guarantees, i.e., show that a file is retrievable within a certain time bound.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review: A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing

TL;DR: A survey of the different security risks that pose a threat to the cloud is presented and a new model targeting at improving features of an existing model must not risk or threaten other important features of the current model.
Posted Content

Provable Data Possession at Untrusted Stores.

TL;DR: Ateniese et al. as discussed by the authors introduced the provable data possession (PDP) model, which allows a client that has stored data at an untrusted server to verify that the server possesses the original data without retrieving it.
Book ChapterDOI

The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems

TL;DR: Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies arc not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage.
Journal ArticleDOI

Enabling Public Auditability and Data Dynamics for Storage Security in Cloud Computing

TL;DR: To achieve efficient data dynamics, the existing proof of storage models are improved by manipulating the classic Merkle Hash Tree construction for block tag authentication, and an elegant verification scheme is constructed for the seamless integration of these two salient features in the protocol design.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing

TL;DR: This paper utilize and uniquely combine the public key based homomorphic authenticator with random masking to achieve the privacy-preserving public cloud data auditing system, which meets all above requirements.
References
More filters

Hourglass schemes: how to prove that cloud files are encrypted

TL;DR: Hourglass schemes as discussed by the authors exploit common cloud infrastructure characteristics, such as limited file-system parallelism and the use of rotational hard drives for at-rest files, to prove correct file encryption.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comments on “Public Integrity Auditing for Dynamic Data Sharing With Multiuser Modification”

TL;DR: A novel integrity auditing scheme for cloud data sharing services characterized by multiuser modification, public auditing, high error detection probability, efficient user revocation as well as practical computational/communication auditing performance is proposed.
Posted Content

Deconstructing Blockchains: A Comprehensive Survey on Consensus, Membership and Structure

TL;DR: This paper proposes an evaluation framework with insight into system models, desired properties and analysis criteria, using the decoupled components as criteria, and uses this framework to provide clear and intuitive overviews of the design principles behind the analyzed systems and the properties achieved.
Book ChapterDOI

How Efficient Can Memory Checking Be

TL;DR: This work shows that for checkers that access the remote storage in a deterministic and non-adaptive manner (as do all known memory checkers), their query complexity must be at least *** (logn /loglogn ).
Proceedings ArticleDOI

DIaaS: Data Integrity as a Service in the Cloud

TL;DR: This paper proposes a secure cloud storage service architecture with the focus on Data Integrity as a Service (DIaaS) based on the principles of Service-Oriented Architecture and Web services, and defines data integrity protocols for a number of different scenarios.
Related Papers (5)