Q2. What have the authors stated for future works in "”pour votre tranquillité”: ambiance, atmosphere, and surveillance" ?
As such, further work is required in thinking about how the authors might be able to write in some kind of ‘ ambiant ’ or ‘ atmospheric ’ way.
Q3. What are the main affective conditions of securitised public space?
The authors see the predominance of ‘panic’, ‘fear’, ‘terror’ and ‘neurosis’ (Füredi, 2005; De Goede and Randalls, 2009; Isin, 2004) as key affective expressive conditions of securitised public space.
Q4. What did the researchers feel during the research process?
For the UK-based academics on their research team this led to both a feeling of liberation, but also a not-always comfortable feeling during the research process about where things may (or more so may not) get to, especially as the authors came to leaving the field and thinking about what the authors had ultimately ‘produced’ as well as ‘collected’.
Q5. What techniques were used to create an ambiant transect?
The authors employed and experimentedwith a range of visual, audio and observational techniques, including audio transects, static and mobile video recording, time-lapse photograph and multi-angle filming.
Q6. What is the meaning of ambient power?
Allen’s ambient power supposes a particular ‘‘character of an urban setting—a particular atmosphere, a specific mood, a certain feeling—that affects how the authors experience it and which, in turn, seeks to induce certain stances which the authors might otherwise have chosen not to adopt’’ (2006: 445).